Do Usability Professionals Think about User Experience in the Same Way as Users and Developers Do?

  • Torkil Clemmensen
  • Morten Hertzum
  • Jiaoyan Yang
  • Yanan Chen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8118)

Abstract

In this paper, we study how usability professionals’ thinking about system use relates to that of system developers and end users. We conducted 72 repertory-grid interviews to capture how usability professionals, developers, and users describe their system use. The participants in each stakeholder group were from China, Denmark, and India. Our results indicate that usability professionals focus on emotion-related aspects of system use, while users focus more on context in terms of utility and degree of usage. There are no interactions between stakeholder group and nationality, although both stakeholder group and nationality independently influence how participants think about usability and user experience. We recommend that to understand users’ concerns, researchers should study context more.

Keywords

Usability professionals UX professionals user experience stakeholder differences cultural differences 

References

  1. 1.
    Bødker, S.: Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hills dale (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dray, S.M.: Engaged Scholars, Thoughtful Practitioners: The Interdependence of Academics and Practitioners in User-Centered Design and Usability. Journal of Usability Studies 5(1), 1–7 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumas, J.: The Great Leap Forward: The Birth of the Usability Profession (1988-1993). Journal of Usability Studies 2(2), 54–60 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleiss, J.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley, New York (1981)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han, S.H., Hwan Yun, M., Kim, K.J., Kwahk, J.: Evaluation of Product Usability: Development and Validation of Usability Dimensions and Design Elements Based on Empirical Models. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 26(4), 477–488 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han, S.H., Yun, M.H., Kwahk, J., Hong, S.W.: Usability of Consumer Electronic Products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 28(3), 143–151 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassenzahl, M., Wessler, R.: Capturing Design Space from a User Perspective: The Repertory Grid Technique Revisited. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 441–459 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hertzum, M., Clemmensen, T.: How Do Usability Professionals Construe Usability? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70(1), 26–42 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hertzum, M., Clemmensen, T., Hornbæk, K., Kumar, J., Shi, Q., Yammiyavar, P.: Personal Usability Constructs: How People Construe Usability across Nationalities and Stakeholder Groups. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27(8), 729–761 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of Human System Interaction-Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems (Formerly Known as 13407). International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Geneva, Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelly, G.A.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Theory and Personality, vol. 1. Norton, New York (1955)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kujala, S., Roto, V., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Karapanos, E., Sinnelä, A.: UX Curve: A Method for Evaluating Long-Term User Experience. Interacting with Computers 23(5), 473–483 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Chichester (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lazar, J., Jones, A., Shneiderman, B.: Workplace User Frustration with Computers: An Exploratory Investigation of the Causes and Severity. Behaviour & Information Technology 25(3), 239–251 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindgaard, G.: Early Traces of Usability as a Science and as a Profession. Interacting with Computers 21(5-6), 350–352 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as Experience. Interactions 11(5), 42–43 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Putnam, C., Kolko, B.: HCI Professions: Differences & Definitions. In: CHI 2012 Extended Abstracts, pp. 2021–2026. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Redish, G., Barnum, C.: Overlap, Influence, Intertwining: The Interplay of UX and Technical Communication. Journal of Usability Studies 6(3), 90–101 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenberg, D., Kumar, J.: Leading Global UX Teams. Interactions 18(6), 36–39 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shackel, B.: Usability-Context, Framework, Definition, Design and Evaluation. Interacting with Computers 21(5-6), 339–346 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tan, F.B., Hunter, M.G.: The Repertory Grid Technique: A Method for the Study of Cognition in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 26(1), 39–57 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walsh, T., Nurkka, P., Walsh, R.: Cultural Differences in Smartphone User Experience Evaluation. In: MUM 2010, Limassol, Cyprus, (Article No. 24). ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Torkil Clemmensen
    • 1
  • Morten Hertzum
    • 2
  • Jiaoyan Yang
    • 3
  • Yanan Chen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of IT ManagementCopenhagen Business SchoolDenmark
  2. 2.Computer Science and InformaticsRoskilde UniversityDenmark
  3. 3.Institute of PsychologyChinese Academy of ScienceBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations