Adoption and Appropriation: A Design Process from HCI Research at a Brazilian Neurological Hospital

  • Junia Anacleto
  • Sidney Fels
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8118)

Abstract

Through our research on natural ICT solutions for integration into a non-ICT based workflow at a Brazilian chronic care hospital, we created a new design process and two additional HCI design criteria for maintaining natural work processes using information and communication technologies (ICT). For our HCI design we propose two design pathways: 1. iterating on adoption of designed technologies and 2. iterating on appropriation of these technologies. The degree of appropriation provides an indicator of how natural a design is since it allows for users’ inventiveness to uncover latent affordances for use in new contexts. Thus, the use of an interface along with whether its potential is realized in new, user-oriented contexts, are critical elements for designing natural interfaces. We report our insights gained through observations and user-centered design for health professionals at a non-ICT based, large chronic-care hospital to support this perspective.

Keywords

human computer interaction appropriation adoption design process user centered design health care mental illness non-disruptive workflow 

References

  1. 1.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, NJ, USA, L. E. Ass (1979)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vuong, C., Ingalls, T., Abbas, J. Transforming clinical rehabilitation into interactive multimedia. In: ACM MM, pp. 1–2, (2011). Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geurts, L., et al.: Digital games for physical therapy: fulfilling the need for calibration and adaptation. In: TEI 2011, pp. 117–124 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norman, D.: Affordances, Conventions, and Design. Interactions 6(3), 38–41 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bath, P.A.: Health informatics: current issues and challenges. J. Inf. Sci. 34-4, 501–518 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, J., Wilson, L., Stapleton, S., Cregan, P.: Design of an advanced telemedicine system for emergency care. In: OZCHI 2006, pp. 413–416 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reeder, B., Turner, A.: Scenario-based design: A method for connecting information system design with public health ops and emerg mgmt. J. Bio. Inform. 44(6), 978–988 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGrenere, J., Ho, W.: Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concept. In: GI 2000, pp. 179–186 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norman, D.A.: Natural User Interfaces are Not Natural. Interactions 17(3), 6–10 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design, 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schönauer, C., et al.: Chronic pain rehabilitation with a serious game using multimodal input. In: Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR), pp. 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Broderick, M., Smaltz, D.: HIMSS E-Health White Paper: e-Health Defined (2008), http://www.himss.org/content/files/ehealth_whitepaper.pdf
  13. 13.
    Dix, A.: Designing for appropriation. BCS HCI (2), 27–30 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junia Anacleto
    • 1
  • Sidney Fels
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceFederal University of Sao CarlosSao CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations