Paraplay: Exploring Playfulness Around Physical Console Gaming

  • John Downs
  • Frank Vetere
  • Steve Howard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8119)

Abstract

We present the concept of paraplay: playful activities that take place within the context of an interactive game or other play activity, but outside the activity itself. By critically examining work related to gaming and play goals and motivations we argue that the concept of playfulness should have a stronger role in our understanding of gaming sessions, and particularly social gaming sessions. In order to further understand the role of playfulness in social gaming we conducted an empirical field study of physical console gaming. Six families with a total of 32 participants were provided with an Xbox 360 console, Kinect sensor, and three casual physical video games to play together for a period of approximately two weeks. Participants were instructed to record their social gaming sessions. We conducted video analysis on these recordings as well as interviews with many of the participants. We found numerous types and examples of playfulness within the gaming session even from those who were not actively participating in the game. Drawing on the results of this study we present a taxonomy of paraplay and discuss the ways that playfulness can be exhibited in a social play session. We show that participants in a game situation act within a wider context of playfulness, according to a variety of significant roles ranging from active player through to audience member. We explore these roles and their attributes to provide a rich account of paraplay and its importance in understanding playful activities broadly.

Keywords

Games context of gaming metagames physical console gaming play social gaming videogames 

References

  1. 1.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press, London (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Consalvo, M.: Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. MIT Press (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Juul, J.: A Casual Revolution: Reinventing Video Games and Their Players. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, H., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M., Francis, P.: Come play with me: Designing technologies for intergenerational play. UAIS 11, 17–29 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Designing a technological playground: A field study of the emergence of play in household messaging. In: Proc. CHI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, p. 2360 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, H., Vetere, F., Francis, P., Gibbs, M., Howard, S.: “I wish we could get together”: Exploring intergenerational play across a distance via a “Magic Box”. J. Intergen. Relationships 6, 191 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Interactive Games & Entertainment Association: Digital Australia 2012. Bond University, Evanleigh, Australia (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blythe, M., Hassenzahl, M.: The semantics of fun: Differentiating enjoyable experiences. In: Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 91–100. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suits, B.: The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Broadview Press (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brynskov, M., Ludvigsen, M.: Mock games: A new genre of pervasive play. In: Proc. DIS 2006, pp. 169–178. ACM, University Park (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whitson, J., Eaket, C., Greenspan, B., Tran, M.Q., King, N.: Neo-immersion: Awareness and engagement in gameplay. In: Proc. Future Play 2008, Toronto, Canada, p. 220 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flynn, B.: Geography of the digital hearth. Information, Communication and Society 6, 551–576 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sall, A., Grinter, R.E.: Let’s get physical! In, out and around the gaming circle of physical gaming at home. JCSCW 16, 199–229 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garfield, R.: Metagames. In: Dietz, J. (ed.) Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Essays on Roleplaying, pp. 16–21. Jolly Roger Games, Charleston (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carter, M., Gibbs, M., Harrop, M.: Metagames, paragames and orthogames: A new vocabulary. In: Proc. FDG 2012, Raleigh, NC (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mueller, F., Gibbs, M.R., Vetere, F.: Design influence on social play in distributed exertion games. In: Proc. CHI 2009, Boston, MA, pp. 1539–1548 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Voida, A., Carpendale, S., Greenberg, S.: The individual and the group in console gaming. In: Proc. CSCW 2010, Savannah, GA, pp. 371–380 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Hara, K., Grian, H., Williams, J.: Participation, collaboration and spectatorship in an alternate reality game. In: Proc. OzCHI 2008, pp. 130–139. ACM, Cairns (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. J. & J. Harper Editions, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Consalvo, M.: There is no magic circle. Games and Culture 4, 408–417 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Juul, J.: The magic circle and the puzzle piece. In: Proc. Phil. Computer Games (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Voida, A., Greenberg, S.: Console gaming across generations: Exploring intergenerational interactions in collocated console gaming. JUAIS 11, 45–56 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jordan, B., Henderson, A.: Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 39–103 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, A., Gajadhar, B.J.: People, places, and play: A research framework for digital game experience in a socio-spatial context. Social Psychology 6, 823–830 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Voida, A., Greenberg, S.: Wii all play: The console game as a computational meeting place. In: Proc. CHI 2009, Boston, MA, pp. 1559–1568 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xu, Y., Barba, E., Radu, I., Gandy, M., MacIntyre, B.: Chores are fun: Understanding social play in board games for digital tabletop game design. In: Proc. DiGRA 2011, Utrecht, Holland (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chalmers, M., Dieberger, A., Höök, K., Rudström, Å.: Social navigation and seamful design. Cognitive Studies 11, 1–11 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Downs
    • 1
  • Frank Vetere
    • 1
  • Steve Howard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing and Information SystemsThe University of MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations