Advertisement

When Can We Trust a Third Party?

A Soundness Perspective
  • Kees M. van Hee
  • Natalia Sidorova
  • Jan Martijn E. M. van der Werf
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8100)

Abstract

Organizations often do not want to reveal the way a product is created or a service is delivered. As a consequence, if two organizations want to cooperate, they contact a trusted third party. Each specifies how it wants to communicate with the other party. The trusted third party then needs to assure that the two organizations cooperate correctly. In this paper, we study requirements on trusted third parties to ensure correct cooperation between the different organizations.

Keywords

Projection Property Initial Place Virtual Enterprise Payment Service Control Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Verification of Workflow Nets. In: Azéma, P., Balbo, G. (eds.) ICATPN 1997. LNCS, vol. 1248, pp. 407–426. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Sidorova, N., Verbeek, H.M.W., Voorhoeve, M., Wynn, M.T.: Soundness of workflow nets: classification, decidability, and analysis. Formal Aspects of Computing, 1–31 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., Massuthe, P., Sidorova, N., van der Werf, J.M.E.M.: Compositional Service Trees. In: Franceschinis, G., Wolf, K. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5606, pp. 283–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Lohmann, N., Massuthe, P., Stahl, C., Wolf, K.: Multiparty Contracts: Agreeing and Implementing Interorganizational Processes. The Computer Journal 53(1), 90–106 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web Services – Concepts, Architectures and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauer, S.S., David, A., Hennicker, R., Guldstrand Larsen, K., Legay, A., Nyman, U., Wąsowski, A.: Moving from specifications to contracts in component-based design. In: de Lara, J., Zisman, A. (eds.) Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. LNCS, vol. 7212, pp. 43–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beisiegel, M., Khand, K., Karmarkar, A., Patil, S., Rowley, M.: Service Component Architecture Assembly Model Specification Version 1.1 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Decker, G., Weske, M.: Local Enforceability in Interaction Petri Nets. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 305–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Hee, K.M., Keiren, J., Post, R., Sidorova, N., van der Werf, J.M.E.M.: Designing case handling systems. In: Jensen, K., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Billington, J. (eds.) Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency I. LNCS, vol. 5100, pp. 119–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Hee, K.M., Sidorova, N., Voorhoeve, M.: Soundness and Separability of Workflow Nets in the Stepwise Refinement Approach. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Best, E. (eds.) ICATPN 2003. LNCS, vol. 2679, pp. 337–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Hee, K.M., Sidorova, N., Voorhoeve, M., van der Werf, J.M.E.M.: Generation of database transactions with petri nets. Fundamenta Informaticae 93(1-3), 171–184 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Massuthe, P., Reisig, W., Schmidt, K.: An Operating Guideline Approach to the SOA. Annals of Mathematics, Computing & Teleinformatics 1(3), 35–43 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mehandjiev, N., Grefen, P.W.P.J. (eds.): Dynamic Business Process Formation for Instant Virtual Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mooij, A.j., Stahl, C., Voorhoeve, M.: Relating fair testing and accordance for service replaceability. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 79(3-5), 233–244 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reisig, W.: Petri Nets: An Introduction. Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science: An EATCS Series, vol. 4. Springer, Berlin (1985)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosa-Velardo, F., de Frutos-Escrig, D., Marroquín-Alonso, O.: On the expressiveness of Mobile Synchronizing Petri nets. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Security and Concurrency (SecCo 2005). ENTCS, vol. 1, pp. 77–94. Elsevier (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    van der Werf, J.M.E.M.: Compositional design and verification of component-based information systems. PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolf, K.: Does My Service Have Partners? In: Jensen, K., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (eds.) Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II. LNCS, vol. 5460, pp. 152–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wolf, K.: Decidability Issues for Decentralized Controllability of Open Nets. In: 17th German Workshop on Algorithms and Tools for Petri Nets, vol. 643, pp. 124–129. CEUR-WS (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kees M. van Hee
    • 1
  • Natalia Sidorova
    • 1
  • Jan Martijn E. M. van der Werf
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Computer ScienceTechnische Universiteit EindhovenEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations