Advertisement

Online Political Debate: Motivating Factors and Impact on Political Engagement

  • Asbjørn Følstad
  • Marika Lüders
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8075)

Abstract

Online political debate is increasing in importance, both as a real world phenomenon and as an object of scientific study. We present a survey study exploring people’s motivations for engaging in online political debate and how such debate may impact their general political engagement. The survey was conducted among 90 participants of an online environment for political debate hosted by one of the main Norwegian political parties. We found four motivational factors with relevance for participation in online political debate: engaging topic, want to contribute, frustration, and reciprocal learning. Sixty-four per cent of the participants answered that the online environment for political debate could make them more politically engaged. These participants reported that such an increase in political engagement could be due to the online environment providing a sense of influence, access to political debate, a means for getting updated, a lowered threshold for participation, motivating local political engagement, and awareness concerning political events.

Keywords

Political Participation Civic Engagement Political Debate Online Environment Deliberative Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Conroy, M., Feezell, J.T., Guerrero, M.: Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 1535–1546 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dahlgren, P.: The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication 22, 147–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahl, R.A.: Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dean, H.: Wikipartia. How the web is restoring democracy to politics. Forbes 179, 94–98 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeWolfe, C.: The MySpace Generation. Fortune 179, 72–74 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ezzy, D.: Qualitative analysis. Routledge (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahn, R., Kellner, D.: Virtually Democratic: Online Communities and Internet Activism. In: Barney, D., Feenberg, A. (eds.) Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice, pp. 183–200. Rowman & Littlefield (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lüders, M.H., Følstad, A., Waldal, E.: Expectations and experiences with MyLabourParty: From right to know to right to participate? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Min, S.: Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: Effects on civic engagement. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, article 11 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sevland, L.J., Berg, D.H., Brosvik, T., Kvaløy, O.A., Moe, B.T., Myrvold, T.M., et al.: Det lokale folkestyret i endring? Om deltaking og engasjement i lokalpolitikken. Departementenes Servicesenter (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stromer-Galley, J., Wichowski, A.: Political Discussion Online. In: Consalvo, M., Ess, C. (eds.) The Handbook of Internet Studies, pp. 168–187. Wiley-Blackwell (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teorell, J.: Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 787–810 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., de Zúñiga, H.G.: Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24, 163–184 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verba, S., Nie, N.H.: Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Harper & Row (1972)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vesnic-Alujevic, L.: Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: A case study of Facebook. Public Relations Review, 466–470 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vitale, D.: Between deliberative and participatory democracy: A contribution on Habermas. Philosophy & Social Criticism 32, 739–766 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    West, D.M.: Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Princeton University Press (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    de Zúñiga, H.G., Jung, N., Valenzuela, S.: Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 319–336 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asbjørn Følstad
    • 1
  • Marika Lüders
    • 1
  1. 1.SINTEFBlindernNorway

Personalised recommendations