MobiWIS 2013: Mobile Web Information Systems pp 157-171 | Cite as

The Influential Factors of M-Government’s Adoption in the Developing Countries

  • Vasileios Yfantis
  • Konstantina Vassilopoulou
  • Adamantia Pateli
  • Abel Usoro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8093)

Abstract

The application of E-government through the use of mobiledevices is a challenge for all the countries. Although developing countries are slow in adopting the new technologies, most of their habitants are already familiar with the use of mobile devices. Despite that, the implementation of m-government is still a problem. Few scholars have researched the adoption of m-government by the developing countries and the influential factors that affect this adoption. The current research explores the influential factors of the m-government adoption by improving the Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. The improved UTAUT model derives from the additional elements of trust, context of use and human development index. The improved UTAUT contributes in the current m-government research by building a conceptual model that will be useful for scholars and policy makers so as to detect the potentiality of the developing countries to adopt m-government.

Keywords

m-government Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology human development index trust context of use 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    United Nations: Compendium of Innovative E-government Practices, New York, vol. III, p. 51(2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Torora, B., Rheault, M.: Mobile Phone Access Varies Widely in Sub-Saharan Africa, http://www.gallup.com/poll/149519/mobile-phone-access-varies-widely-sub-saharan-africa.aspx
  4. 4.
    Yelton, A.: Bridging the Digital Divide with Mobile Services. American Library Association, Chicago (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    OECD, International Telecommunication Union: M-Government Mobile Technologies for Responsive Governments and Connected Societies: Mobile Technologies for Responsive Governments and Connected Societies. OECD Publishing (2011) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cupido, K., Van Belle, J.P.: Increased Public Participation in Local Government Through the Use of Mobile Phones: What Do Young South Africans Think? In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on e-Government, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 159–168 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zmijewska, A., Elaine, L., Seele, R.: Towards understanding of factors influencing user acceptance of mobile payment systems. In: Proceedings of IADIS International Conference, Madrid, Spain (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rokhman, A.: E-Government Adoption in Developing Countries; the Case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences 2(5) (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ghyasi, F., Kushchu, I.: M-Government: Cases of developing countries. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on E-Government, Castle Dublin, Ireland (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foster, V., Garmendia, C.: Africa’s infrastructure: a time for transformation. World Bank Publications, Washington (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reddick, C.: Comparative E-government, pp. 241–258. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rannu, R., Saksing, S., Mahlakõiv, T.: Mobile Government: and Beyond. Working Document. Mobi Solutions, Ltd. (January 2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carroll, J.: What’s in It for Me? Taking M.Government to the People. Paper Presented at the 19th Bled eConference, Bled (June 5, 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagel, R.: Human Development Index - an Elaborate Means of Evaluating a Country’s Hd. GRIN Verlag, Norderstedt (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ISO 13407: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. Geneva: International Standards Organisation. Also available from the British Standards Institute London (1999) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maguire, M.: Context of Use within usability activitie. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 55, 453–483 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clarke, K.: Trust in Technology: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Qiyang, C.: Human computer interaction: issues and challenges. IGI Global, Hershey (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harindranath, G., Zupančič, J.: New perspectives on information systems development: theory, methods, and practice. Springer, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Knight, G., Roosa, M., Umaña-Taylor, A.: Studying Ethnic Minority and Economically Disadvantaged Populations: Methodological Challenges and Best Practices. Amer Psychological Assn., Washington (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ryan, M.J.: Behavioral intention formation: The interdependency of attitudinal and social influence variables. Journal of Consumer Research 9, 263–278 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharma, S.: E-adoption and Technologies for Empowering Developing Countries: Global Advancements. IGI Global, Hershey (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ajzen, I.: From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D., Davis, G.B.: User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khosrow-Pour, M.: Advanced Topics in Information Resource Management, vol. 1, pp. 106–107. Idea Group Publishing, London (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aronson, E., Carlsmith, J.M.: Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65(3), 178–182 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Friedkin, N.E.: A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Duraipandian, I., Rakesh, T.: Empirical study of factors influencing acceptance of e-government services in India. In: ICEGOV 2011 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 141–146. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    MacFarland, T., Parker, R.: Expert systems in education and training. Educational Technology, New Jersey (1990)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Simon and Schuster, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    United Nations: Human Development Report 1990. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990) Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sullivan, A., Sheffrin, S.: Economics: Principles in action, p. 473. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2003) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lauren Soelberg Treasure, Mobile Phone Usage Positively Linked to Life Expectancy, http://healthdecide.orcahealth.com/2012/09/05/national-cell-phone-usage-may-improve-life-span/
  36. 36.
    Baaren, E., van de Wijngaert, L., Huizer, E.: ’I Want My HDTV’? Underlying Factors of Perceived Usefulness for High Definition Television. In: Tscheligi, M., Obrist, M., Lugmayr, A. (eds.) EuroITV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5066, pp. 283–292. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Qiao, L., Feng, L., Zhou, L.-z.: Information Presentation on Mobile Devices: Techniques and Practices. In: Zhang, Y., Yu, G., Bertino, E., Xu, G. (eds.) APWeb 2008. LNCS, vol. 4976, pp. 395–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ronkainen, S., Koskinen, E., Liu, Y., Korhonen, P.: Environment Analysis as a Basis for Designing Multimodal and Multidevice User Interfaces. Journal of Human-computer Interaction 25(2), 148–193 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yong, L., Hongxiu, L.: Exploring the impact of use context on mobile hedonic services adoption: An empirical study on mobile gaming in China. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior 27(2), 890–898 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alzahrani, M.E., Goodwin, R.D.: Towards a UTAUT based Model for the Study of EGovernment Citizen Acceptance in Saudi Arabia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 64(6), 8–14 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(1), 211–241 (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Weerakkody, V., Al-Shafi, S., Zahir I., Habin, L.: E-Government Adoption In Qatar: An Investigation Of The Citizens’ Perspective, Adoption and Diffusion Interest Group In Information Technology. Proceedings. Paper 3 (2009), http://aisel.aisnet.org/digit2009/3
  43. 43.
    Vincent, J., Harris, L.: Examining adoption behavior of mobile government: How do we reach the tipping point? Information, Communication & Society 11(3), 395–413 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shareef, M.A., Archer, N., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Examining adoption behavior of mobile government. Journal of Computer Information Systems 53(2), 39–48 (2012)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
  46. 46.
    Chatora, A.: Encouraging Political Participation in Africa: The Potential of Social Media Platforms. Institute for Security Studies (2012), http://dspace.cigilibrary.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/32998/1/15Mar2012SocialMedia.pdf?1

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasileios Yfantis
    • 1
  • Konstantina Vassilopoulou
    • 2
  • Adamantia Pateli
    • 3
  • Abel Usoro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ComputingUniversity of the West of ScotlandPaisleyUK
  2. 2.Department of Informatics & TelematicsHarokopio UniversityAthensGreece
  3. 3.Department of InformaticsIonian UniversityCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations