Detection of Visual Defects in Citrus Fruits: Multivariate Image Analysis vs Graph Image Segmentation

  • Fernando López-García
  • Gabriela Andreu-García
  • José-Miguel Valiente-Gonzalez
  • Vicente Atienza-Vanacloig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8047)

Abstract

This paper presents an application of visual quality control in orange post-harvesting comparing two different approaches. These approaches correspond to two very different methodologies released in the area of Computer Vision. The first approach is based on Multivariate Image Analysis (MIA) and was originally developed for the detection of defects in random color textures. It uses Principal Component Analysis and the T2 statistic to map the defective areas. The second approach is based on Graph Image Segmentation (GIS). It is an efficient segmentation algorithm that uses a graph-based representation of the image and a predicate to measure the evidence of boundaries between adjacent regions. While the MIA approach performs novelty detection on defects using a trained model of sound color textures, the GIS approach is strictly an unsupervised method with no training required on sound or defective areas. Both methods are compared through experimental work performed on a ground truth of 120 samples of citrus coming from four different cultivars. Although the GIS approach is faster and achieves better results in defect detection, the MIA method provides less false detections and does not need to use the hypothesis that the bigger area in samples always correspond to the non-damaged area.

Keywords

Fruit Inspection Automatic Quality Control Multivariate Image Analysis Principal Component Analysis Unsupervised Methods 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blasco, J., Aleixos, N., Moltó, E.: Computer vision detection of peel defects in citrus by means of a region oriented segmentation algorithm. Journal of Food Engineering 81(3), 535–543 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    López, F., Prats, J.M., Ferrer, A., Valiente, J.M.: Defect Detection in Random Colour Textures Using the MIA T2 Defect Maps. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M.S. (eds.) ICIAR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4142, pp. 752–763. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bharati, M.H., MacGregor, J.F.: Texture analysis of images using Principal Component Analysis. In: SPIE/Photonics Conference on Process Imaging for Automatic Control, pp. 27–37 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geladi, P., Granh, H.: Multivariate Image Analysis. Wiley, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prats-Montalbán, J.M., Ferrer, A.: Integration of colour and textural information in multivariate image analysis: defect detection and classification issues. Journal of Chemometrics 21(1-2), 10–23 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felzenszwalb, P.F., Huttenlocher, D.P.: Efficient Graph-Based Image Segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision 59(2), 167–181 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urquhart, R.: Graph theoretical clustering based on limited neighborhood sets. Pattern Recognition 15(3), 173–187 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zahn, C.T.: Graph-theoretic methods for detecting and describing gestalt clusters. IEEE Transactions on Computing 20(1), 68–86 (1971)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando López-García
    • 1
  • Gabriela Andreu-García
    • 1
  • José-Miguel Valiente-Gonzalez
    • 1
  • Vicente Atienza-Vanacloig
    • 1
  1. 1.Instituto de Automática e Informática IndustrialUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations