Reverse Engineering of Database Security Policies

  • Salvador Martínez
  • Valerio Cosentino
  • Jordi Cabot
  • Frédéric Cuppens
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8056)

Abstract

Security is a critical concern for any database. Therefore, database systems provide a wide range of mechanisms to enforce security constraints. These mechanisms can be used to implement part of the security policies requested of an organization. Nevertheless, security requirements are not static, and thus, implemented policies must be changed and reviewed. As a first step, this requires to discover the actual security constraints being enforced by the database and to represent them at an appropriate abstraction level to enable their understanding and reenginering by security experts. Unfortunately, despite the existence of a number of techniques for database reverse engineering, security aspects are ignored during the process. This paper aims to cover this gap by presenting a security metamodel and reverse engineering process that helps security experts to visualize and manipulate security policies in a vendor-independent manner.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Astrova, I.: Towards the semantic web - an approach to reverse engineering of relational databases to ontologies. In: ADBIS Research Communications. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 152 (2005), CEUR-WS.org
  2. 2.
    Barker, S., Douglas, P.: RBAC policy implementation for SQL databases. In: DBSec, pp. 288–301 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Basin, D., Doser, J., Lodderstedt, T.: Model driven security: From UML models to access control infrastructures. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 15, 39–91 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiang, R.H.L., Barron, T.M., Storey, V.C.: Reverse engineering of relational databases: extraction of an EER model from a relational database. Data Knowl. Eng. 12, 107–142 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jürjens, J.: UMLsec: Extending UML for secure systems development. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) UML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2460, pp. 412–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lodderstedt, T., Basin, D., Doser, J.: SecureUML: A UML-based modeling language for model-driven security. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) UML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2460, pp. 426–441. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iuc Hainaut, J., Chandelon, M., Ch, M., Tonneau, C., Joris, M.: Contribution to a theory of database reverse engineering. In: Proc. of the IEEE Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering, pp. 161–170. IEEE Computer Society (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oh, S., Park, S.: Enterprise model as a basis of administration on role-based access control. In: CODAS 2001, pp. 165–174 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petit, J.-M., Kouloumdjian, J., Boulicaut, J.-F., Toumani, F.: Using queries to improve database reverse engineering. In: Loucopoulos, P. (ed.) ER 1994. LNCS, vol. 881, pp. 369–386. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandhu, R., Ferraiolo, D., Kuhn, R.: The NIST model for role-based access control: towards a unified standard. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control, RBAC 2000, pp. 47–63. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shehab, M., Al-Haj, S., Bhagurkar, S., Al-Shaer, E.: Anomaly discovery and resolution in mySQL access control policies. In: Liddle, S.W., Schewe, K.-D., Tjoa, A.M., Zhou, X. (eds.) DEXA 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7447, pp. 514–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvador Martínez
    • 1
  • Valerio Cosentino
    • 1
  • Jordi Cabot
    • 1
  • Frédéric Cuppens
    • 2
  1. 1.ATLANMOD, & École des Mines de Nantes, INRIA, LINANantesFrance
  2. 2.Télécom BretagneUniversité Européenne de BretagneCesson SévignéFrance

Personalised recommendations