Production Plan-Driven Flexible Assembly Automation Architecture

  • Alois Zoitl
  • Gerd Kainz
  • Nadine Keddis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8062)

Abstract

Manufacturing industries are currently under a strong pressure to easily adapt to changing market situations. In order to stay profitable production automation systems need to flexibly adapt to different products, product variants, and product volumes. In this work we investigate how a flexible recipe-based control approach can be transferred from batch automation systems to discrete manufacturing. We define a generic control architecture and a manufacturing recipe model that allows to execute recipe parts directly in the low-level control devices of the involved manufacturing cells. An evaluation of the developed system on a demonstration plant shows the aptness for discrete manufacturing. The developed system with its flexibility on the lowest control level can also serve as a foundation for highly flexible supervising control strategies like the HMS approach.

Keywords

Recipe-based control discrete manufacturing flexible adaptive production 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cyber-Physical Systems: Driving Force for Innovation in Mobility, Health, Energy and Production. acatech Position, acatech – National Academy of Science and Engineering (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arens, D., Hopfgartner, T., Jensen, T., Lamping, M., Pieper, M., Seger, D.: Packaging Machine Language V3.0 Mode & States Definition Document. OMAC Motion for Packaging Working Group (June 2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brandl, D.: Design Patterns for Flexible Manufacturing. ISA (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christensen, J.: Holonic manufacturing systems—initial architecture and standards directions. In: 1st European Confernce Holonic Manufacturing Systems (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Covanich, W., McFarlane, D.: Comparing the control structures of isa s88- and holonic component-based architecture. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews 41(1), 4–13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eckert, K., Hadlich, T., Frank, T., Fay, A., Diedrich, C., Vogel-Heuser, B.: Design patterns for distributed automation systems with consideration of non-functional requirements. In: 17th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keddis, N., Kainz, G., Buckl, C., Knoll, A.: Towards adaptable manufacturing systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT 2013). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., Van Brussel, H.: Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 48(2), 527–540 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lohse, N., Hirani, H., Ratchev, S., Turitto, M.: An ontology for the definition and validation of assembly processes for evolvable assembly systems. In: The 6th IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning: From Nano to Macro Assembly and Manufacturing (ISATP 2005), pp. 242–247 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    NAMUR: NE 033 Requirements to be met by Systems for Recipe-Based Operations (January 2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sauer, O., Jasperneite, J.: Adaptive information technology in manufacturing. In: CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Madison, WI, USA (June 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen, W., Wang, L., Hao, Q.: Agent-based distributed manufacturing process planning and scheduling: a state-of-the-art survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 36(4), 563–577 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sorouri, M., Patil, S., Vyatkin, V.: Distributed control patterns for intelligent mechatronic systems. In: IEEE Conference on Industrial Informatics (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Storr, A., Lewek, J., Lutz, R.: Modeling and reuse of object-oriented machine software. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Integration in Manufacturing, pp. 475–484 (1997), http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/1999/407
  15. 15.
    Sünder, C., Zoitl, A., Christoph, D.: Functional structure-based modelling of automation systems. International Journal of Manufacturing Research 1(4), 405–420 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanenbaum, A.S., Goodman, J.R.: Structured Computer Organization, 4th edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vogel-Heuser, B., Kegel, G., Bender, K., Wucherer, K.: Global information architecture for industrial automation. ATP (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zäh, M.F., Beetz, M., Shea, K., Reinhart, G., Stursberg, O., Ostgathe, M., Lau, C., Ertelt, C., Pangercic, D., Rühr, T., et al.: An integrated approach to realize the cognitive machine shop. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Cognition for Technical Systems, München, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zha, X.F., Lim, S.Y.E., Lu, W.F.: A knowledge intensive multi-agent system for cooperative/collaborative assembly modeling and process planning. Transactions of the SDPS, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 7(1), 99–122 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zoitl, A., Prähofer, H.: Guidelines and Patterns for Building Hierarchical Automation Solutions in the IEC 61499 Modeling Language. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics PP(99), 1 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alois Zoitl
    • 1
  • Gerd Kainz
    • 1
  • Nadine Keddis
    • 1
  1. 1.fortiss, An-Insitut der Technischen Universität MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations