Advertisement

Actors, Holonic Enterprises, Ontologies and Multi-agent Technology

  • Vladimir A. Vittikh
  • Vladimir B. Larukhin
  • Alexander V. Tsarev
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8062)

Abstract

Holonic enterprises are considered as one of the new types of networking organizations used to increase business efficiency. But in practice it requires to introduce a new type of management stimulating the interpreneur approach, active interaction between actors within the project teams, coordinated and effective decisions on resource scheduling in case of unpredictable events (new projects, breakdowns, delays, illnesses etc.). In the paper we propose the concept of holonic enterprise based on the principles of intersubjective management and describe Smart Enterprise system for supporting decision making for such types of enterprises. The system combines top-down project planning with real time on-line and bottom-up communication with employees. This provides more intelligent, flexible and efficient resource scheduling in case of unexpected events. The functionality and architecture of Smart Enterprise system based on the use of ontology and multi-agent technology is outlined. The first results of the system use and perspectives are analyzed.

Keywords

actor intersubjectiveness holon management ontology project multi-agent technology resource scheduling real time 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, R.A., Kast, F.E., Rosenzweig, J.E.: The Theory and Management of Systems, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shepard, H.A.: Changing Relationships in Organizations. In: March, J.G. (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago (1965)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vittikh, V.A.: Introduction to the theory of intersubjective management. Samara: SSC RAS, 64 p. (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Open Innovations. Proceedings of Moscow Forum of Innovations, Moscow (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koestler, A.: The Ghost in the Machine. Arcana books, London (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vittikh, V.A., Skobelev, P.O.: Multi-agent models of interaction to design the resource and demand networks. Automation and Telemetry (1), 162–169 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vittikh, V.A., Skobelev, P.O.: Method of contiguous interactions for real time resource allocation management. Autometry (2), 78–87 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skobelev, P.: Multi-Agent Systems for Real Time Resource Allocation, Scheduling, Optimization and Controlling: Industrial Applications. In: Mařík, V., Vrba, P., Leitão, P. (eds.) HoloMAS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6867, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leung, J.Y.-T. (ed.): Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models and Performance Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC Computer and Information Science Series (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Voß, S.: Meta-heuristics: The state of the art. In: Nareyek, A. (ed.) ECAI-WS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2148, pp. 1–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir A. Vittikh
    • 1
  • Vladimir B. Larukhin
    • 1
  • Alexander V. Tsarev
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Control of Complex SystemsRussian Academy of ScienceSamaraRussian Federation
  2. 2.Smart Solutions, Ltd.SamaraRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations