Organization Cycle and Evaluation of Its Flux and Capability

Conference paper
First Online:

Abstract

It is vital for organization management to harmonize their mutual force and relations in workers or departments. Traditional organization management is used to disjoining force and counterforce in organization and studying them separately. In fact, force and counterforce is a whole which symbioses and interacts each other. Force and counterforce form a closed cycle. From this cycle system, people can study organization better than before. It is helpful for organization management to evaluate its flux and capability. The researchers can evaluate flux from forward flux, backward flux and system flux. The evaluation of capability can be processed from balance, robustness and smoothness.

Keywords

Cycle Capability Evaluation Flux Force 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen LA (1958) Management and organization [M]. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 61–62Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin CY, Clark KB (1997) Managing in an age of modularity [J]. Harv Bus Rev 75(5):84–93Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design rules: the power of modularity [M]. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bing L, Xiutai Y, Wenhan Z, Xun Z (2003) The discussion of group incentive model [J]. J Chongqing Unive (Nat Sci Ed) 26(10):124–126Google Scholar
  5. Brech EFL (1957) Organization [M]. Longmans, Green, London, pp 27–29Google Scholar
  6. Chandler A (1962) Strategy and structure [M]. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 69Google Scholar
  7. Daft RL (1999) Essentials of organization theory & design [M]. China Machine Press, Beijing, p 7Google Scholar
  8. Gilbreth FB, Gilbreth LM (1924) Classifying the elements of work [J]. Manag Adm 8(2):151Google Scholar
  9. Gulick L, Urwick L (1937) Papers on the science of administration [M]. Institute of Public Administration, New York, pp 3–13Google Scholar
  10. Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate [J]. Harv Bus Rev 68(4):104–112Google Scholar
  11. Hammer M, Champy G (1994) Reengineering the corporation a Manifesto for business revolution [M]. Harper Collins Publishers Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation [J]. Psychol Rev 50:370–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Presthus RV (1958) Toward a theory of organizational behavior [J]. Adm Sci Q 3(1):50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott WG (1961) Organization theory: an overview and an appraisal [J]. Acad Manag J 4(1):7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith A (1994) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations [M]. The Commercial Press, Beijing, p 5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations