Study on Returns to Scale Consistency Between the Weak BCC Inefficient DMUs and Their Projection in DEA

Conference paper
First Online:

Abstract

This paper discusses estimation of returns to scale (RTS) of Weak BCC inefficient DMUs in DEA. RTS generally has an ambiguous meaning if DMU is not on Weak BCC efficient frontier. Researchers adopt projection method for this problem. Theoretically, a Weak BCC inefficient DMU and its projection should exhibit the same RTS nature. Banker et~al. (Eur J Oper Res 88:583–585, 1996b)’s projection, however, may give inconsistent estimation of RTS in some cases. For accurate RTS estimation of Weak BCC inefficient DMUs, this paper establishes Weak BCC projection and strong BCC projection. It is proved that, for a Weak BCC inefficient DMU, it is its Weak BCC projection that always exhibits the same RTS nature as itself while its strong BCC projection is not in some cases. In addition, Weak BCC projection is the most representative point among all frontier points for Weak BCC inefficient DMU. Therefore the projection should be Weak BCC projection, not strong BCC projection, when estimating RTS of Weak BCC inefficient DMUs.

Keywords

Banker’s projection DEA RTS The most representative point Weak BCC inefficient DMUs Weak BCC projection 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZXH2011C009) and the Starting Foundation for PhD in Civil Aviation University of China (08QD02X) supported this work.

References

  1. Banker RD (1984) Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 17:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banker RD, Thrall RM (1992) Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 62:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banker RD, Chang H, Cooper WW (1996a) Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 89:473–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banker RD, Bardhan I, Cooper WW (1996b) A note on returns to scale in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 88:583–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banker RD, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Thrall RM, Zhu J (2004) Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Oper Res 154:345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Thrall RM (1991) A structure for classifying efficiencies and inefficiencies in DEA. J Product Anal 2:197–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer/Nijhoff. Publishing Co., BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) An investigation of returns to scale under data envelopment analysis. Omega 27:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wei QL (2004) Data envelopment analysis. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  14. Wei QL, Yan H (2004) Congestion and returns to scale in data, envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 153:641–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wei QL, Yu G, Lu JH (2002) The necessary and sufficient conditions for returns to scale properties in generalized data envelopment analysis model. Sci China (Ser E) 5(45):503–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhu J (2000) Setting scale efficient targets in DEA via returns to scale estimation methods. J Oper Res Soc 51(3):376–378Google Scholar
  17. Zhu J (2003) Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhu J, Shen Z (1995) A discussion of testing DMUs’ returns to scale. Eur J Oper Res 81:590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementTianjin UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Tianjin Key Lab of Operation Programming and Safety Technology of Air Traffic ManagementTianjinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations