IT Governance in a Malaysian Public Institute of Higher Learning and Intelligent Decision Making Support System Solution

  • Abdul Rahman Ahlan
  • Yusri Arshad
  • Binyamin A. Ajayi
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 55)

Abstract

IT governance in public universities is yet to be fully appreciated. This is because IT governance is just evolving as a new paradigm to take care of the stakeholders’ expectations in leveraging IT with business goals. This study explores issues of IT governance and the use of IDMSS in a public university in Malaysia. The interviews and documents were analysed to generate themes. The findings show the need for effective IT governance in the university. This will enable optimal usage of IT resources, which are expected to have an impact on the university’s performance. Moreover, COBIT framework is presented to provide the benchmark of international standards and practices that the university can adopt in the future. Finally, two IDMSS methods are presented for application in this study. This empirical study on IT governance in the context of a public Institute of Higher learning in Malaysia attempts to document the role of IT and the evolution of its practices in the context of a university.

Keywords

IT governance COBIT IT service management IDMSS 

References

  1. 1.
    Ajayi, B.A., Badi, B., Al-ani, M., Dahlan, A.: Taking community-based system to Malaysian communities for disaster management. Int. J. Human. Soc. Sci. 1(7), 171–177 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bannister, F., Remenyi, D.: Why IT continues to matter: reflections on the strategic value of IT. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 8(3), 159–168 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carr, N.: IT doesn’t matter. Harv. Bus. Rev. 81, 41–49. (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT), 3rd edn. IT Governance Institute (ITGI), Rolling Meadow, IL, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Creswell, J.W.: Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 3rd edn. Merrill, Upper Saddle River (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galliers, R.D.: Strategic information systems planning: myths, reality and guidelines for successful implementation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 1, 55–64 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golovina Elena Y.: An approach to designing intelligent decision-making support systems on the basis of the logic-semiotic apparatus. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Systems (ICAIS’02) (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grix, J.: The Foundations of Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ismail, N.A.: Information technology governance, funding and structure: a case analysis of a public university in Malaysia. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 25, 145–160. (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ITGI.: Board Briefing on IT Governance. IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard-measure that drives performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70, 71–79 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marrone, M., Hoffman, L., Kolbe, L.M.: IT executives’ perception of CobiT: satisfaction, business-IT alignment and benefits. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–10. Lima, Peru (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pardo, T.A., Gil-Garcia, R.J., Burke, B.G.: Governance structures in cross-boundary information sharing: lessons from state and local criminal justice initiatives. In: Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 211–220. IEEE, Waikoloa Hawaii (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saldana, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publication, London (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simonsson M., Johnson, P., Ekstedt, M.: The effect of IT governance maturity on IT governance performance. Inf. Syst. Manag. 27, 10–24 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simonsson, M.: Predicting IT Governance Performance: A Method for Model-Based Decision Making. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Industrial Information and Control Systems KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: Enterprise governance of IT in practice. In: Van Grembergen W. (ed.) Enterprise Governance of Information Technology, pp. 21–75. Springer, New York, USA (2009) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S., Guldentops, E.: Structures, processes and relational mechanisms for IT governance. In: Van Grembergen, W. (ed.) Strategies for Information Technology Governance, pp. 1–36. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vathanophas, V., Stuart, L.: Enterprise resource planning: technology acceptance in Thai University. Enter. Inf. Syst. 3(2), 133–158 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Venkatraman, N.: Valuing the IS contributions to business. Comput. Sci. Corp (1999) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vicziany, M., Puteh, M.: Vision 2020, the multimedia supercoridor and Malaysian universities. In Cribb, D.R. (ed.) Proceedings 15th Biennial Conference of Asian Studies Association of Australia, pp. 1–20. Canberra, Australia (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Webb, P., Pollard, C., Ridley, G.: Attempting to define IT governance: wisdom or folly? In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10. IEEE , Hawaii (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weill, P., Ross J.: Designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 46(2), Winter (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: IT Governance-How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yanosky, R., Caruso, J.B.: Process and politics: IT governance in higher education. Educause Cent. Appl. Res. 1–10 (2008) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdul Rahman Ahlan
    • 1
  • Yusri Arshad
    • 2
  • Binyamin A. Ajayi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsInternational Islamic University MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Universiti Teknikal Malaysia MelakaDurian TunggalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations