A Hybrid Approach for Business Environment-Aware Management of Service-Based Business Processes

  • Olfa Bouchaala
  • Samir Tata
  • Mohamed Jmaiel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 152)

Abstract

Enterprises struggle to find a balance between adapting their business processes (BPs) against business environments and keeping competitiveness. Indeed, while the imperative nature of monolithic BPs is too rigid to adapt them at runtime, the declarative one of the purely rule-based BPs is very time-consuming. Therefore, in this paper, we focus on business environment-aware management of service-based business processes (SBPs) aiming at conciliating imperative and declarative techniques. Our challenge is to develop a hybrid management approach that (1) preserves standards to describe SBPs, (2) keeps non-dependency to a specific BP engine and (3) minimizes designers’ efforts. Based on a semantic modeling, we are able to synthesize a controller, itself modeled as a BP, connected to the BP to be monitored and configured. Using our approach does not impact any existing business process management system since controllers are BPs that can be deployed and enacted along with the managed processes.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boukhebouze, M., Amghar, Y., Benharkat, A.-N., Maamar, Z.: A rule-based modeling for the description of flexible and self-healing business processes. In: Grundspenkis, J., Morzy, T., Vossen, G. (eds.) ADBIS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5739, pp. 15–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., Rosa, M.L.: Configurable workflow models. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 17(2), 177–221 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ouyang, B., Zhong, F., Liu, H.: An eca-based control-rule formalism for the bpel process modularization. Procedia Environmental Sciences 11(1), 511–517 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gong, Y., Janssen, M.: Creating dynamic business processes using semantic web services and business rules. In: ICEGOV, pp. 249–258 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weigand, H., van den Heuvel, W.J., Hiel, M.: Business policy compliance in service-oriented systems. Inf. Syst. 36(4), 791–807 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boukhebouze, M., Amghar, Y., Benharkat, A.N., Maamar, Z.: Towards an approach for estimating impact of changes on business processes. In: CEC (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Business process model and notation 2.0, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/
  8. 8.
    Ferrante, J., Ottenstein, K.J., Warren, J.D.: The program dependence graph and its use in optimization. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 9(3), 319–349 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mao, C.: Slicing web service-based software. In: SOCA, pp. 1–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koning, M., Ai Sun, C., Sinnema, M., Avgeriou, P.: Vxbpel: Supporting variability for web services in bpel. Information & Software Technology 51(2), 258–269 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charfi, A., Dinkelaker, T., Mezini, M.: A plug-in architecture for self-adaptive web service compositions. In: ICWS, pp. 35–42 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olfa Bouchaala
    • 1
    • 2
  • Samir Tata
    • 1
  • Mohamed Jmaiel
    • 2
  1. 1.TELECOM SudParis, CNRS UMR SamovarInsitut Mines-TelecomEvryFrance
  2. 2.ReDCAD LaboratoryUniversity of SfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations