Effect of Rhythm on Pedestrian Flow

  • Daichi Yanagisawa
  • Akiyasu Tomoeda
  • Katsuhiro Nishinari
Conference paper

Abstract

We have calculated a fundamental diagram of pedestrians by dividing the velocity term into two parts, length of stride and pace of walking (number of steps per unit time). In spite of the simplicity of the calculation, our fundamental diagram reproduces that of traffic and pedestrian dynamics models in special cases. Theoretical analysis on pace indicates that rhythm which is slower than normal walking pace in free-flow situation increases flow if the fundamental diagram of flow is convex downward in high-density regime. In order to verify this result, we have performed the experiment by real pedestrians and observed improvement of pedestrian flow in congested situation by slow rhythm. Since slow rhythm achieves large pedestrian flow without dangerous haste, it may be a safety solution to attain smooth movement of pedestrians in congested situation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to appreciate the staffs of our experiment described in Sect. 4 for helping us. This work is financially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Japan Science and Technology Agency.

References

  1. 1.
    Dirk Helbing. Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems. Rev. Mod. Phys., 73(4):1067–1141, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreas Schadschneider, Debashish Chowdhury, and Katsuhiro Nishinari. Stochastic Transport in Complex Systems. Elsevier, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dirk Helbing and Péter Molnár. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 51(5):4282–4286, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Masakuni Muramatsu, Tunemasa Irie, and Takashi Nagatani. Jamming transition in pedestrian counter flow. Physica A, 267:487–498, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Burstedde, K. Klauck, A. Schadschneider, and J. Zittartz. Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two-dimensional cellular automaton. Physica A, 295:507–525, 2001.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniel R. Parisi, Marcelo Gilman, and Herman Moldovan. A modification of the social force model can reproduce experimental data of pedestrian flows in normal conditions. Physica A, 388:3600–3608, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohcine Chraibi, Armin Seyfried, and Andreas Schadschneider. Generalized centrifugal-force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 82(4):046111, 2010.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Armin Seyfried, Bernhard Steffen, Wolfram Klingsch, and Maik Boltes. The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited. J. Stat. Mech., 2005:P10002, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J Zhang, W Klingsch, A Schadschneider, and A Seyfried. Transitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and t-junctions. J. Stat. Mech., 2011:P06004, 2011.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Online-Database at ped-net.org homepage (http://www.pednet.org/) and the references there in, 2008.
  11. 11.
    Daichi Yanagisawa, Ayako Kimura, Akiyasu Tomoeda, Ryosuke Nishi, Yushi Suma, Kazumichi Ohtsuka, and Katsuhiro Nishinari. Introduction of frictional and turning function for pedestrian outflow with an obstacle. Phys. Rev. E, 80(3):036110, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daniel Jezbera, David Kordek, Jan Kříž, Petr Šeba, and Petr Šroll. Walkers on the circle. J. Stat. Mech., 2010:L01001, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frank Spitzer. Interaction of markov processes. Adv. Math., 5(2):246–290, 1970.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Derrida. An exactly soluble non-equilibrium system: The asymmetric simple exclusion process. Physics Reports, 301(1–3):65–83, 1998.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stephen Wolfram. Cellular Automata and Complexity: Collected Papers. 1994.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. R. Evans. Phase transitions in one-dimensional nonequilibrium systems. Braz.J.Phys., 30(1):42–57, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Masahiro Kanai. Exact solution of the zero-range process: fundamental diagram of the corresponding exclusion process. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 40:7127–7138, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kai Nagel and Michael Schreckenberg. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J. Phys. I France, 2:2221–2229, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Bando, K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, and Y. Sugiyama. Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys. Rev. E, 51(2):1035–1042, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daichi Yanagisawa
    • 1
  • Akiyasu Tomoeda
    • 2
    • 3
  • Katsuhiro Nishinari
    • 4
  1. 1.College of ScienceIbaraki UniversityMitoJapan
  2. 2.Meiji Institute for Advanced Study of Mathematical SciencesMeiji UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.CREST, Japan Science and Technology AgencyTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Research Center for Advanced Science and TechnologyThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations