OBDA and Intermodal Logistics: Active Projects and Applications

  • Jean-Rémi Bourguet
  • Giuseppe Cicala
  • Luca Pulina
  • Armando Tacchella
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7994)


In this paper we present the current state of affairs about our funded research projects concerning the investigation of Ontology-Based Data Access in the context of intermodal logistics. This application domain is particularly challenging for two main motivation. On the one hand, it is characterized by very large amounts of data; on the other hand, the design of a conceptual layer must strike a balance between efficient but potentially simplistic models, and sophisticated, but potentially highly inefficient ones.


Decision Support System Container Terminal Quay Crane Conjunctive Query Query Processor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bechhofer, S., Van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A., et al.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation 10 (February 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouamrane, M.-M., Rector, A., Hurrell, M.: Using owl ontologies for adaptive patient information modelling and preoperative clinical decision support. Knowledge and Information Systems 29(2), 405–418 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rodriguez-Muro, M., Rosati, R.: Ontologies and databases: The DL-lite approach. In: Tessaris, S., Franconi, E., Eiter, T., Gutierrez, C., Handschuh, S., Rousset, M.-C., Schmidt, R.A. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2009. LNCS, vol. 5689, pp. 255–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casu, M., Cicala, G., Tacchella, A.: Ontology-based data access: An application to intermodal logistics. Information Systems Frontiers (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceccaroni, L., Cortés, U., Sànchez-Marrè, M.: Ontowedss: augmenting environmental decision-support systems with ontologies. Environmental Modelling & Software 19(9), 785–797 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuenca-Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: The Next Step for OWL. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 6(4), 309–322 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fensel, D., Horrocks, I., Van Harmelen, F., Decker, S., Erdmann, M., Klein, M.: OIL in a nutshell. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gennari, J.H., Musen, M.A., Fergerson, R.W., Grosso, W.E., Crubézy, M., Eriksson, H., Noy, N.F., Tu, S.W.: The Evolution of Protégé: An Environment for Knowledge-Based Systems Development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58(1), 89–123 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Happel, H.-J., Seedorf, S.: Applications of ontologies in software engineering. In: Proc. of Workshop on Sematic Web Enabled Software Engineering (SWESE) on the ISWC, pp. 5–9 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Reducing shiq-description logic to disjunctive datalog programs. In: Proc. KR, vol. 4, pp. 152–162 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kazakov, Y.: \(\cal R I Q\) and \(\cal S R O I Q\) are Harder than \(\cal S H O I Q\). In: Description Logics (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B., Bock, C., Fokoue, A., Haase, P., Hoekstra, R., Horrocks, I., Ruttenberg, A., Sattler, U., et al.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. W3C Recommendation 27 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murty, K.G., Liu, J., Wan, Y.-W., Linn, R.: A decision support system for operations in a container terminal. Decision Support Systems 39(3), 309–332 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prud’Hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommendation 15 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodriguez-Muro, M., Calvanese, D.: Quest, an OWL 2 QL Reasoner for Ontology-based Data Access. In: OWLED (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seaborne, A.: ARQ – A SPARQL Processor for Jena, (accessed May 1, 2010)
  17. 17.
    Shearer, R., Motik, B., Horrocks, I.: Hermit: A highly-efficient owl reasoner. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2008), pp. 26–27 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Cuenca-Grau, B., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5(2), 51–53 (2007), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas, E., Pan, J.Z., Ren, Y.: TrOWL: Tractable OWL 2 reasoning infrastructure. In: Aroyo, L., Antoniou, G., Hyvönen, E., ten Teije, A., Stuckenschmidt, H., Cabral, L., Tudorache, T. (eds.) ESWC 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6089, pp. 431–435. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Turban, E., Aronson, J., Liang, T.-P.: Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Pearson Prentice Hall (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Rémi Bourguet
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Cicala
    • 2
  • Luca Pulina
    • 1
  • Armando Tacchella
    • 2
  1. 1.POLCOMINGUniversità di SassariItaly
  2. 2.DIBRISUniversità di GenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations