Developing Methodology for Experimentation Using a Nuclear Power Plant Simulator
Many of today’s most complicated systems are human-machine systems that involve extensive advanced technology and a team of highly trained operators. As these human-machine systems are so complex, it is important to understand the factors that influence operator performance, operator state (e.g., overloaded, underload, stress) and the types of errors that operators make. Thus, it is desirable to develop an experimental methodology for studying complex systems that involve team operations. This paper looks at Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) operations as a test case for building this methodology. The methodology will reference some aspects/details specific to NPPs, but the general principles are intended to extend to any complex system that involves team operations.
KeywordsNuclear Power Plant Task Type Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity Response Planning Subject Matter Expert
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Ayaz, H., Willems, B., Bunce, S., Shewokis, P.A., Hah, S., Deshmukh, A.R., Onaral, B.: Cognitive workload assessment of air traffic controllers using optical brain imaging sensors. In: Marek, T., Karwowski, W., Rice, V. (eds.) Advances in Understanding Human Performance: Neuroergonomics, Human Factors Design, and Special Populations, pp. 21–32. Taylor & Francis Group (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Baker, K., Olson, J., Morisseau, D.: Work practices, fatigue, and nuclear powerplant safety performance. Human Factors 36, 244–257 (1994)Google Scholar
- 7.Kramer, A.F.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-task Performance. Taylor & Francis Group, London (1991)Google Scholar
- 9.O’Hara, J.M., Higgins, J.C.: Human-system interfaces to automatic systems: Review guidance and technical bases. Human Factors of advanced reactors (NRC JCN Y-6529) BNL Tech Report No BNL91017-2010 (2010)Google Scholar
- 10.O’Hara, J., Higgins, J., Brown, W., Fink, R., Persensky, J., Lewis, P., Kramer, J., Szabo, A., Boggi, M.: Human Factors Considerations with Respect to Emerging Technology in Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG/CR-6947). U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (2008a) Google Scholar
- 11.Reinerman-Jones, L.E., Cosenzo, K., Nicholson, D.: Subjective and objecttive measures of operator state in automated systems. In: Marek, T., Karwowski, W., Rice, V. (eds.) Advances in Understanding Human Performance: Neuroergonomics, Human Factors Design, and Special Populations (2010)Google Scholar
- 12.Reinerman-Jones, L.E., Matthews, G., Langheim, L.K., Warm, J.S.: Selection for vigilance assignments: A review and proposed new directions. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1–23 (2010)Google Scholar
- 16.Wilson, G.F., Fullenkamp, P., Davis, I.: Evoked-potential, cardiac, blink, and respiration measures of pilot workload in air-to-ground missions. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 65(2), 100–105 (1994)Google Scholar