Advertisement

Reaching Today’s Information Security Students

  • Helen Armstrong
  • Ron Dodge
  • Colin Armstrong
Conference paper
  • 1.3k Downloads
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 406)

Abstract

Classes at university today comprise students from the Baby Boomers, Generation X and Y. The different outlooks on life of these generations affect their choice of education options and their learning preferences. There are numerous ways academics can innovatively deliver Information Security learning materials that meet the needs of these generations, whilst still achieving the educational goals. This paper discusses some observations of students in the different generations in information security courses and methods that may be used to ensure a more meaningful learning experience for both the teacher and the learner.

Keywords

information security education Generation X Y Net Generation 

References

  1. 1.
    Rickes, P.C.: Make way for millennials! How today’s students are shaping higher education space. Planning for Higher Education 37(2), 7–17 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagle, T.: Coaching Generation X (2007), http://www.coachingandmentoring.com/Articles/x's.html (retrieved January 31, 2009)
  3. 3.
    Black, J.: Gen Xers Return to College: Enrollment Strategies for a Maturing Population, Aacrao, Washington DC (2003) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howe, N., Strauss, W.: Millenials go to College, 2nd edn. LifeCourse Associates, Great Falls (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Payne, S.L., Holmes, B.: Communication challenges for management faculty involving younger Generation. Journal of Management Education 22(3), 344–367 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsao, J., Takahashi, K., Olusesu, J., Jain, S.: Transformative Learning. In: Orey, M. (ed.) Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology (2006), http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/ (retrieved January 05, 2009)
  7. 7.
    Taylor, M.: Generation neXt comes to college: 2006 updates and emerging issues (2006), http://www.taylorprograms.org/images/Gen_NeXt_article_HLC_06.pdf (retrieved January 13, 2009)
  8. 8.
    Greenberg, J.E., Delgutte, B., Gray, M.L.: Hands-on learning in biomedical signal processing. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 22(4), 71–79 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mountain, J.R.: Work in progress - applied process control systems design: hands-on laboratory experiences for multiple disciplines and academic levels. In: 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, FIE 2004, vol. 1, pp. T1D 3–4 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. In: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Green & Company, Longmans (1956)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolb, D.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Armstrong
    • 1
  • Ron Dodge
    • 2
  • Colin Armstrong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ISCurtin University of TechnologyAustralia
  2. 2.IETDUSMAWest PointUSA

Personalised recommendations