Advertisement

A Survey about Faults of Robots Used in RoboCup

  • Gerald Steinbauer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7500)

Abstract

Faults that occur in an autonomous robot system negatively affect its dependability. The aim of truly dependable and autonomous systems requires that one has to deal with these faults in some way. In order to be able to do this efficiently one has to have information on the nature of these faults. Very few studies on this topic have been conducted so far. In this paper we present results of a survey on faults of autonomous robots we conducted in the context of RoboCup. The major contribution of this paper is twofold. First we present an adapted fault taxonomy suitable for autonomous robots. Second we give information on the nature, the relevance and impact of faults in robot systems that are beneficial for researcher dealing with fault mitigation and management in autonomous systems.

Keywords

Fault Diagnosis Robot System Autonomous Robot Related Fault Laser Range Finder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Visser, U., Burkard, H.: RoboCup: 10 Years of Achivements and Future Challenges. AI Magazine 28(2) (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlson, J., Murphy, R.R.: How UGVs Physically Fail in the Field. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21, 423–437 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steinbauer, G., Mörth, M., Wotawa, F.: Real-time diagnosis and repair of faults of robot control software. In: Bredenfeld, A., Jacoff, A., Noda, I., Takahashi, Y. (eds.) RoboCup 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4020, pp. 13–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandstötter, M., Hofbaur, M., Steinbauer, G., Wotawa, F.: Model-based fault diagnosis and reconfiguration of robot drives. In: IEEE Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), San Diego, CA, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tomatis, N., Terrien, G., Piguet, R., Burnier, D., Bouabdallah, S., Arras, K.O., Siegwart, R.: Designing a Secure and Robust Mobile Interacting Robot for the Long Term. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Taipei, Taiwan (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bererton, C., Khosla, P.: An analysis of cooperative repair capabilities in a team of robots. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 1, pp. 476–482 (May 2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verma, V., Gordon, G., Simmons, R., Thrun, S.: Real-time fault diagnosis. Robotics & Automation Magazine 11(2), 56–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Long, M., Murphy, R., Parker, L.L.: Distributed multi-agent diagnosis and recovery from sensor failures. In: Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alami, R., Chatila, R., Fleury, S., Ghallab, M., Ingrand, F.: An architecture for autonomy. Intenational Journal of Robotics Research 17, 315–337 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Volpe, R., Nesnas, I.A.D., Estlin, T., Mutz, D., Petras, R., Das, H.: CLARAty: Coupled Layer Architecture for Robotic Autonomy. Technical report, NASA - JPL (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muscettola, N., Nayak, P.P., Pell, B., Williams, B.C.: Remote Agent: to boldly go where no AI system has gone before. Artificial Intelligence 103(1-2), 5–47 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lauer, M., Riedmiller, M.: Participating in Autonomous Robot Competitions: Experiences from a Robot Soccer team. In: IJCAI 2009 Workshop on Competitions in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Pasadena, CA, USA (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleiner, A., Dornhege, C.: Real-time localization and elevation mapping within urban search and rescue scenarios: Field Reports. Journal of Field Robotics 24, 723–745 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wisspeintner, T., van der Zant, T., Iocchi, L., Schiffer, S.: RoboCup@home: Scientific Competition and Benchmarking for Domestic Service Robots. Interaction Studies. Special Issue on Robots in the Wild 10(3), 392–426 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schiffer, S., Wortmann, A., Lakemeyer, G.: Self-Maintenance for Autonomous Robots controlled by ReadyLog. In: Proceedings of the 7th IARP Workshop on Technical Challenges for Dependable Robots in Human Environments, Toulouse, France, pp. 101–107 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Steinbauer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Software TechnologyGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations