Game-Based Interactive Media in Behavioral Medicine: Creating Serious Affective-Cognitive-Environmental-Social Integration Experiences

  • Alasdair G. Thin
  • Marientina Gotsis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8013)

Abstract

The need to refocus health systems more towards prevention is now widely recognized, since most of the major disease conditions in the developed world have significant behavioral determinants. However, most efforts to date have been limited in their impact as they have generally failed to take account of the complex hierarchy of interacting social and environmental influences. The reality of life in a networked society is such there is now an additional set of corresponding influences that arise in the digital world(s) that an individual inhabits. Concurrent with these developments, the rapid emergence of a wide range of digital technologies offers a whole new set of affordances and potential health applications. We therefore argue for the design of digital supportive environments that utilize mobile devices, sensors, social media, game worlds and mechanics, in order to create transformative experiences that can effect large scale positive health behavior change.

Keywords

health promotion games supportive environment empowerment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Kok, G., Gottlieb, N.H., Commers, M., Smerecnik, C.: The ecological approach in health promotion programs: a decade later. Am. J. Health Promot. 22, 437–442 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zichermann, G., Linder, J.: Game-Based Marketing. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.: Theory at a Glance. A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC (2005) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palmeira, A.L., Teixeira, P.J., Branco, T.L., et al.: Predicting short-term weight loss using four leading health behavior change theories. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 4, 14 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLeroy, K.R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., Glanz, K.: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ. Q. 15, 351–377 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    U.S. National Physical Activity Plan, http://www.physicalactivityplan.org/theplan.php
  10. 10.
    Palmeira, A.L., Thin, A.G.: Active video games as an example of a cyber-ecological approach to health promotion. In: ISBNPA Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thin, A.G.: Interactive and exercise-generating gaming/video games, active gaming. In: Diet, Physical Activity and Health – A European Platform for Action, Brussels, Belgium (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Currie, C.E., Amos, A., Hunt, S.: The dynamics and process of behavioural change in five classes of health-related behaviour-findings from qualitative research. Health Educ. Res. 6, 443–453 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cendrowski, S.: Nike’s new marketing mojo. Fortune Magazine (February 27, 2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Games for Health Project, http://gamesforhealth.org/about/
  16. 16.
    Panksepp, J.: Affective Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens. Beacon Press, Boston (1955)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Juul, J.: Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mandryk, R.L., Atkins, M.S., Inkpen, K.M.: A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments. In: CHI 2006: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1027–1036 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tones, K., Tilford, S.: Health Promotion: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity, 3rd edn. Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tones, K.: Devising strategies for preventing drug misuse: the role of the Health Action Model. Health Educ. Res. 2, 305–317 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryan, R.M., Rigby, C.S., Przybylski, A.: The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motiv. Emotion. 30, 347–363 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Amer. Psych. 55, 68–78 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lewis, F.M.: The concept of control: a typology and health-related variables. Adv. Health Ed. Prom. 2, 277–309 (1987)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yee, N.: Motivations for play in online games. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 9, 772–775 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lieberman, D.A.: Interactive Video Games for Health Promotion: Effects on Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and Health. In: Street, R.L., Gold, W.R., Manning, T. (eds.) Health promotion and interactive technology: theoretical applications and future directions, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1997)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barr, P., Khaled, R., Boyland, J., Biddle, R.: Feeling strangely fine: The well-being economy in popular games. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 60–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alasdair G. Thin
    • 1
  • Marientina Gotsis
    • 2
  1. 1.Heriot-Watt UniversityUK
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations