Advertisement

The Link between Inclusive Design and Innovation: Some Key Elements

  • Kristin Skeide Fuglerud
  • David Sloan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8004)

Abstract

It is often said that universal design and similar approaches can be a source of innovation. In this paper key elements in inclusive design are identified, and examples of innovations related to inclusive design are presented. Then, some core elements of the inclusive design process that will help spur innovation are identified. Based on this the link between inclusive design and innovation is discussed. Finally, some recommendations for an inclusive and innovative design process are presented.

Keywords

inclusive design accessibility universal design user-centered design user diversity user involvement innovation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dong, H., Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Inclusive Design in Industry: Barriers, Drivers and the Business Case. In: Stary, C., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UI4ALL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3196, pp. 305–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Newell, A.F.: Design and the Digital Divide: Insights from 40 years in Computer Support for Older and Disabled People. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shneiderman, B., Hochheiser, H.: Universal usability as a stimulus to advanced interface design. Behaviour & Information Technology 20, 367–376 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Countering design exclusion: bridging the gap between usability and accessibility. Universal Access in the Information Society 2, 215–225 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A.: Universal Access in the Information Society: Methods, Tools, and Interaction Technologies. Universal Access in the Information Society 1, 40–55 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gregor, P., Newell, A.F., Zajicek, M.: Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pp. 151–156. ACM (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clarkson, J.P., Coleman, R., Keates, S., Lebbon, C. (eds.): Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. Springer, London (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Design for All e-Accessibility Network, http://www.edean.org
  10. 10.
    Wobbrock, J.O., Kane, S.K., Gajos, K.Z., Haradam, S., Froehlich, J.: Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 3, 1–27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC 40500:2012: Information Technology – W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 9241-20:2008: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 20: Accessibility guidelines for information/communication technology (ICT) equipment and services. ISO (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ISO 9241-171:2008: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 171: Guidance on software accessibility, p. 88. ISO (2008) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Theofanos, M.F., Redish, J.: Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability. Interactions 10, 36–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Power, C., Freire, A.P., Petrie, H., Swallow, D.: Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, USA, pp. 433–442. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arrue, M., Vigo, M., Abascal, J.: Automatic Evaluation of Mobile Web Accessibility. In: Stephanidis, C., Pieper, M. (eds.) ERCIM Ws UI4ALL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4397, pp. 244–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kelly, B., Sloan, D., Brown, S., Seale, J., Lauke, P., Ball, S., Smith, S.: Accessibility 2.0: Next steps for web accessibility. Journal of Access Services 6, 265–294 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paddison, C., Englefield, P.: Applying heuristics to perform a rigorous accessibility inspection in a commercial context. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacobs, S.: Fueling the Creation of New Electronic Curbcuts, vol. 2012. The Center for an accessible society (1999), http://www.accessiblesociety.org/topics/technology/eleccurbcut.htm
  20. 20.
    Eikhaug, O., Gherawo, R., Plumbe, C., Berg, M.S., Kunur, M. (eds.): Innovating with people. The business of inclusive design. The Norwegian Design Council (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dredge, S.: Android apps scoop prizes in 2012 Smart Accessibility Awards contest (2012), http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/appsblog/2012/dec/17/2012-smart-accessibility-apps-awards
  22. 22.
    Project: Possibility, http://ss12.info/
  23. 23.
    Dong, H., Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J., Cassim, J.: Implementing Inclusive Design: The Discrepancy between Theory and Practice. In: Carbonell, N., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UI4ALL 2002. LNCS, vol. 2615, pp. 106–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dong, H., Cassim, J., Coleman, R.: Addressing the Challenges of Inclusive Design: A Case Study Approach. In: Stephanidis, C., Pieper, M. (eds.) ERCIM Ws UI4ALL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4397, pp. 273–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pullin, G., Rogers, J., Banks, R., Regan, T., Napier, A., Duplock, P.: Social Digital Objects for Grandparents. In: Include 2011 Conference on Inclusive and People-centred Design. Royal College of Art, London (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dong, H., Keates, S., Clarkson, J.: Inclusive design in industry: motivations and barriers. SIGCAPH Comput. Phys. Handicap., 9–10 (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    NCD: The accessible future. National Council on Disability (2001) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kline, J.: Strategic IT Accessibility: Enabling the Organization. Live Oak Book Company (2011) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shum, P., Lin, G.: A world class new product development best practices model. International Journal of Production Research 45, 1609–1629 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kyng, M.: Bridging the Gap Between Politics and Techniques: On the next practices of participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 22, Article 5 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blomberg, J., Burrell, M., Guest, G.: An ethnographic approach to design. In: Julie, A.J., Andrew, S. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, pp. 964–986. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kujala, S.: Effective user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs. Behaviour & Information Technology 27, 457–473 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poetz, M.K., Schreier, M.: The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management 29, 245–256 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cajander, Å.: Usability - Who Cares? The introduction of User-Centered Systems Design in Organisations. Faculty of Science and Technology, PhD, p. 122. Uppsala University (2011) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pullin, G., Newell, A.F.: Focussing on Extra-Ordinary Users. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 253–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tohidi, M., Buxton, W., Baecker, R., Sellen, A.: Getting the right design and the design right. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Monteal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 1243–1252. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dow, S.P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D.L., Klemmer, S.R.: Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 1–24 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Prior, S., Waller, A., Kroll, T.: Focus groups as a requirements gathering method with adults with severe speech and physical impairments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–10 (2011)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vanderheiden, G.: Fundamental principles and priority setting for universal usability. In: Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability, Arlington, Virginia, United States. ACM Press (2000)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fuglerud, K.S.: Universal design in ICT services. In: Vavik, T. (ed.) Inclusive Buildings, Products & Services: Challenges in Universal Design, Trondheim, Norway, pp. 244–267 (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Keates, S.: Designing for Accessibility: A Business Guide to Countering Design Exclusion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, Mahwah (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Savidis, A., Stephanidis, C.: Unified user interface design: designing universally accessible interactions. Interacting with Computers 16, 243–270 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin Skeide Fuglerud
    • 1
  • David Sloan
    • 2
  1. 1.Norsk RegnesentralBlindernNorway
  2. 2.School of ComputingUniversity of DundeeScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations