Advertisement

Supervisory Control Interface Design for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles through GEDIS-UAV

  • Salvador Lorite
  • Adolfo Muñoz
  • Josep Tornero
  • Pere Ponsa
  • Enric Pastor
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8004)

Abstract

This paper reflects the state of art in the field of human factors for unmanned aerial vehicles. It describes the GEDIS-UAV guide, which is a modification of the GEDIS guide. It also shows the evaluation of the Sky-eye project graphical user interface as an example of the methodology. The analysis and evaluation method reflected in this paper may be used to improve the graphical user interface of any unmanned aerial vehicle.

Keywords

Supervisory Control Unmanned Vehicles Ergonomics GEDIS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Air Force Research Laboratory. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (October 2007), http://www.wpafb.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070418-024.pdf
  2. 2.
    ARINC: Aeronautical Radio. Incorporated (2010), http://www.aviation-ia.com/aeec/projects/cds/index.html
  3. 3.
    Carrigan, G.P., Long, D., Cummings, M.L., Duffner, J.: Human Factors Analysis of Predator B Crash. In: Proceedings of AUVSI 2008: Unmanned Systems North America, San Diego, California (June 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cummings, M.L., Kirschbaum, A.R., Sulmistras, A., Platts, J.T.: STANG 4586 Human Supervisory Control Implications. In: Proceedings of UVS Canada Annual Conference, Montebello, Quebec, Canada (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper, J.G.: Cognitive Engineering Research Institute (June 2007), http://www.cerici.com/documents/2007_workshop/6-1-BYU-Cooper.pdf
  6. 6.
    Endsley, M.: Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foundation, F. S. Flight Safety Digest, Alexandria, Virginia, United States (May 2005), http://flightsafety.org/fsd/fsd_may05.pdf
  8. 8.
    ISO: International Organization for Standardization (2000), http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=30030
  9. 9.
    Lorite, S.: Diseño de interfaces de supervisión de vehículos aéreos no tripulados (2008), http://www.institutoidf.com/instituto/downloads/user_center_design_interfaces/Interfaces_Vehiculos_Aereos_No_Tripulados.pdf
  10. 10.
    Martinez, J.: AutoNAV4D. A co-simulator for Unmanned Aircraft Systems. BarcelonaTech, Castelldefels (2008) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NATO: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (2007), http://www.nato.int/structur/AC/224/standard/AEDP2/AEDP2_Documents/AEDP-02v1.pdf
  12. 12.
    Nimmo: Designing control rooms for humans. Control Magazine (2004) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Owen, D.: Air Accident Investigation, New Edition. PSL Patrick Stephens Limited, Somerset England (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pastor, E., Royo, P., Lopez, J., Barrado, C., Santamaria, E., Prats: Project SKY-EYE. Applying UAVs to Forest Fire Fighter Support and Monitoring. In: UAV 2007 Conference (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pastor, E., Lopez, J., Royo, P.: A Hardware/Software Architecture for UAV Payload and Mission Control. In: 25th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pastor, E., Lopez, J., Royo, P.: An Embedded Architecture for Mission Control of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. In: 9th EuroMicro Conference on Digital Systems (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pastor, E., Prats, X., Royo, P., Delgado, L., Santamaria, E.: UAS Pilot Support for Departure, Approach and Airfield Operations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Montana, United States (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ponsa, P., Díaz, M.: Creation of an Ergonomic Guideline for Supervisory Control Interface Design. In: Harris, D. (ed.) HCII 2007 and EPCE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4562, pp. 137–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ponsa, P., Vilanova, R., Amante, B.: Human intervention and interface design in automation systems. International Journal of Computers, Communications & Control 6(1), 166–174 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    RTCA: Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, and the European Organization for Civil Aviation Equipment EUROCAE (1992), http://www.do178site.com/
  21. 21.
    Schneiderman, B.: Designing the user interface. Strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheridan, T.B.: Telerrobotics, automation and human supervisory control. M.I.T. Press (1992)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Society of Automotive Engineers SAE, Unmanned Systems Technical Committee AS4 (2010), http://standards.sae.org/as5684a/
  24. 24.
    Strauch, B.: Investigating Human Error: Incidents, Accidents and Complex Systems. Ashgate Publishing (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Terrence Fong, C.T.: Vehicle Teleoperation Interfaces. Autonomous Robots 11, 9–18 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    William, T.: U.S. Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mishaps: Assessment of the Role of Human Factors Using Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) (2005), http://www.wpafb.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090226-154.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvador Lorite
    • 1
  • Adolfo Muñoz
    • 1
  • Josep Tornero
    • 1
  • Pere Ponsa
    • 2
  • Enric Pastor
    • 3
  1. 1.Design and Manufacturing Institute (IDF)Polytechnic University of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Automatic Control DepartmentUPC BarcelonaTech UniversityVilanova I la GeltrúSpain
  3. 3.ICARUS Research GroupUPC BarcelonaTech UniversityCastelldefelsSpain

Personalised recommendations