Advertisement

Measuring UAS Pilot Responses to Common Air Traffic Clearances

  • Jason Ziccardi
  • Zach Roberts
  • Ryan O’Connor
  • Conrad Rorie
  • Gregory Morales
  • Vernol Battiste
  • Thomas Strybel
  • Dan Chiappe
  • Kim-Phuong L. Vu
  • Jay Shively
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8017)

Abstract

Using a simulated ground control station, this study documents the methods for measuring the verbal response and execution time of unmanned aerial system (UAS) pilots to direct commands from air traffic controllers (ATCos). Although prior research has examined characteristics of ATCo-manned aircraft communication, there is very little literature on response times of UAS-ATCo communication. Thus, there is a great need to examine the measured response of UAS pilots to ATCo commands given that there will be more extensive inclusion of UAS operations in the national airspace in the near future. The present paper aims to provide a methodology for measuring part of the UAS and ATCo interaction, one that can be used in future studies involving UAS operations in the national airspace.

Keywords

unmanned aerial systems measured response air traffic management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ambrosia, V.G., Wegener, S., Zajkowski, T., Sullivan, D.V., Buechel, S., Enomoto, F., Lobitz, B., et al.: The Ikhana unmanned airborne system (UAS) western states fire imaging missions: from concept to reality (2006–2010). Geocarto International 26(2), 85–101 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    112th Congress, FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (2012), http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-112hrpt381/pdf/CRPT-112hrpt381.pdf (retrieved)
  3. 3.
    Cardosi, K.M.: Time Required for Transmission of Time-Critical Air Traffic Control Messages in an En Route Environment. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3(4), 303–314 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rantanen, E.M., McCarley, J.S., Xu, X.: Time Delays in Air Traffic Control Communication Loop: Effect on Controller Performance and Workload. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 14(4), 369–394 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sollenberger, R.L., McAnulty, M., Kerns, K.: The Effect of Voice Communications Latency in High Density. Communications-Intensive Airspace (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prevot, T.: Exploring the many perspectives of distributed air traffic management: The Multi Aircraft Control System: MACS. In: International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, HCI–Aero 2002, pp. 23–25 (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fern, L., Shively, J.: Designing airspace displays to support rapid immersion for UAS handoffs. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, pp. 81–85. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Ziccardi
    • 1
  • Zach Roberts
    • 1
  • Ryan O’Connor
    • 1
  • Conrad Rorie
    • 2
  • Gregory Morales
    • 1
  • Vernol Battiste
    • 2
  • Thomas Strybel
    • 1
  • Dan Chiappe
    • 1
  • Kim-Phuong L. Vu
    • 1
  • Jay Shively
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State University Long BeachLong BeachUSA
  2. 2.NASA Ames Research CenterMoffett FieldUSA

Personalised recommendations