New Online Algorithms for Story Scheduling in Web Advertising

  • Susanne Albers
  • Achim Passen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7966)

Abstract

We study storyboarding where advertisers wish to present sequences of ads (stories) uninterruptedly on a major ad position of a web page. These jobs/stories arrive online and are triggered by the browsing history of a user who at any time continues surfing with probability β. The goal of an ad server is to construct a schedule maximizing the expected reward. The problem was introduced by Dasgupta, Ghosh, Nazerzadeh and Raghavan (SODA’09) who presented a 7-competitive online algorithm. They also showed that no deterministic online strategy can achieve a competitiveness smaller than 2, for general β.

We present improved algorithms for storyboarding. First we give a simple online strategy that achieves a competitive ratio of 4/(2 − β), which is upper bounded by 4 for any β. The algorithm is also 1/(1 − β)-competitive, which gives better bounds for small β. As the main result of this paper we devise a refined algorithm that attains a competitive ratio of c = 1 + φ, where \(\phi=(1+\sqrt{5})/2\) is the Golden Ratio. This performance guarantee of c ≈ 2.618 is close to the lower bound of 2. Additionally, we study for the first time a problem extension where stories may be presented simultaneously on several ad positions of a web page. For this parallel setting we provide an algorithm whose competitive ratio is upper bounded by \(1/(3-2\sqrt{2})\approx 5.828\), for any β. All our algorithms work in phases and have to make scheduling decisions only every once in a while.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Buchbinder, N., Feldman, M., Ghosh, A., Naor, J(S.): Frequency capping in online advertising. In: Dehne, F., Iacono, J., Sack, J.-R. (eds.) WADS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6844, pp. 147–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchbinder, N., Jain, K., Naor, J(S.): Online primal-dual algorithms for maximizing ad-auctions revenue. In: Arge, L., Hoffmann, M., Welzl, E. (eds.) ESA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4698, pp. 253–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dasgupta, A., Ghosh, A., Nazerzadeh, H., Raghavan, P.: Online story scheduling in web adverstising. In: Proc. 20th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1275–1284 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Feldman, J., Korula, N., Mirrokni, V., Muthukrishnan, S., Pál, M.: Online ad assignment with free disposal. In: Leonardi, S. (ed.) WINE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5929, pp. 374–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feige, U., Immorlica, N., Mirrokni, V.S., Nazerzadeh, H.: A combinatorial allocation mechanism with penalties for banner advertising. In: Proc. 17th International Conferene on World Wide Web, pp. 169–178 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feldman, J., Mehta, A., Mirrokni, V.S., Muthukrishnan, S.: Online stochastic matching: Beating 1-1/e. In: Proc. 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 117–126 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghosh, A., Sayedi, A.: Expressive auctions for externalities in online advertising. In: Proc. 19th International Conferene on World Wide Web, pp. 371–380 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    marketingterms.com. Surround session, http://www.marketingterms.com/dictionary/surround_session/
  11. 11.
    Mehta, A., Saberi, A., Vazirani, U.V., Vazirani, V.V.: AdWords and generalized online matching. Journal of the ACM 54(5) (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sleator, D.D., Tarjan, R.E.: Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules. Communications of the ACM 28, 202–208 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Albers
    • 1
  • Achim Passen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations