Interaction Design for Robotic Avatars Does Avatar’s Aging Cue Affect the User’s Impressions of a Robot?

  • Angie Lorena Marin
  • Sukhan Lee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8010)

Abstract

Human Computer/Robot Interaction has concerned about developing embodied computer/robot agents effective for their use in user interaction. In particular, the study on the dependency of the interaction design on the target users has been of a core theme to investigate. For instance, in the case of designing an embodied agent such as an avatar specifically to support the performance of a robot assistant to the elderly, the aspect of social interaction with the older adults should be of a serious concern. In this paper, we present a study that explores the relationship between the degree of aging cues (i.e., the visual features related to the age of embodied agents) and the level of perceived anthropomorphism, intelligence, safety and likeability by the older adults as customers. The study found that avatar aging cues affect the perception of the older adults in intelligence and safety: the older adults perceived the agent more intelligent with older avatars but safer with younger avatars. However, the aging cue seems not affecting the sense of anthropomorphism and likeability on users. An Interesting finding is the difference in the likability associated with the aging cue according to the gender of the older adults: the male participants tend to like older avatars while the female participants the younger ones. Since how the older adults perceive the aging cues of avatars could affect their expectation and trust on the assistant robots, thus, the findings related to the aging cue influence in the design of a series of attributions of the robots in terms of their roles and capabilities. Based on the results of this work, we can approach toward design considerations to help guide interaction designers in creating the visual appearance of an embodied agency as the robotic avatar interfaces for the elderly.

Keywords

Robotics avatar embodied agent elderly aging cues interfaces user experience 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goldstein, J.R.: How population age. In: Uhlenberg, P. (ed.) International Handbook of Population Aging, pp. 7–18. Springer, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, Rockville, MD (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thorpe, J., Thorpe, C., Kennelty, K., Pandhi, N.: Patterns of perceived barriers to medical care in older adults: A latent class analysis. BMC Health Serv. Res, (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, R., Mason, A.: Fertility, human capital, and economic growth over the demographic transition. European Journal of Population 26, 159–182 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breazeal, C.: Designing sociable machines. The MIT Press (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damer, B., Gold, S., De Bruin, J.: Steps Toward learning in virtual world cyberspace: The U Virtual University and BOWorld (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laurel, B.: Interface agents; Metaphors with character. In: Laurel, B. (ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oren, T.: Guides: Characterizing the Interface. In: Laurel, B. (ed.) The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    King, W.J., Ohya, J.: The Representation of Agents: Anthropomorphism, Agency, and Intelligence. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 289–290 (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naas, C., et al.: Computers are Social Actors. In: Proceedings of the 1994 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 72–77. ACM Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Don, A.: Anthropomorphism: From Eliza to Terminator 2. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 67–70 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cassell, J.: More than just another pretty face: Embodied conversational interface agents. Commun. ACM 43(4) (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cowell, A.J., Stanney, K.M.: Embodiement and Interaction Guidelines for Designing Credible, Trustworthy Embodied Conversational Agents. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 301–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Forluzzi, J., Zimmerman, J., Mancuso, V., Kwak, S.: How Interface Agents Affect Interaction between Humans and Computers. Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Paper 39 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reed, D.J., Fitzpatrick, G.: Acting your age in Second life. In: Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Rowland, D. (eds.) Fun and Games 2008. LNCS, vol. 5294, pp. 158–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harley, D., Fitzpatrick, G., Axelrod, L., White, G., McAllister, G.: Making the Wii at home: Game Play by Older People in Sheltered Housing. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 156–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benford, R.D.: Social Issues. Macmillan, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garau, M., Slater, M., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni, A., Steed, A., Sasse, M.A.: The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bessiere, K., Seay, A.F., Kiesler, S.: The ideal elf: identity exploration in world of warcraft. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 10, 530–535 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rousseau, D., Hayes-Roth, B.: A social-psychological model for synthetic actors. In: Agents 1998: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 165–172. ACM Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bartneck, C., Kulić, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement Instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(1), 71–81 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angie Lorena Marin
    • 1
  • Sukhan Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonRep. of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Interaction Science, School of Information and Communication EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonRep. of Korea

Personalised recommendations