Modality-Independent Interaction Framework for Cross-Disability Accessibility
People with disabilities often have difficulty using ICT and similar technologies because of a mismatch between their needs and the requirements of the user interface. The wide range of both user abilities and accessibility guidelines makes it difficult for interface designers who need a simpler accessibility framework that still works across disabilities. A modality-independent interaction framework is proposed to address this problem. We define modality-independent input as non-time-dependent encoded input (such as that from a keyboard) and modality-independent output as electronic text. These formats can be translated to provide a wide range input and output forms as well as support for assistive technologies. We identify three interfaces styles that support modality-independent input/output: command line, single-keystroke command, and linear navigation interfaces. Tasks that depend on time, complex-path, simultaneity, or experience are identified as providing barriers to full cross-disability accessibility. The framework is posited as a simpler approach to wide cross-disability accessibility.
KeywordsCross-cultural product and service design disability accessibility framework input output interaction user interface modality independence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Vanderheiden, G.C., Jordan, J.B.: Design for people with functional limitations. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors, 4th edn., pp. 1409–1441. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2012)Google Scholar
- 2.Vanderheiden, G.C.: Accessible and Usable Design of Information and Communication Technologies. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) The Universal Access Handbook, pp. 3-1–3-26. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar
- 3.Hodgkinson, R.: 10th Report on International ICT Accessibility Standards: Proposed, Being Developed and Recently Published (2009), http://tiresias.org/research/standards/report_10.htm
- 4.International Organization for Standardization/International Electrochemical Commission (ISO/IEC): ISO/IEC TR 29138-2:2009: Information Technology—Accessibility Considerations for People with Disabilities—Part 2: Standards Inventory. ISO, Geneva (2009)Google Scholar
- 5.Vanderheiden, G. C.: Standards and Guidelines. In Stephanidis, C. (ed.) The Universal Access Handbook, pp. 54-1– 54-21. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board: Telecommunications Act Accessibility Guidelines; Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards. Federal Register 76(236) pp. 76640–76646 (December 8, 2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Vanderheiden, G.C., Henry, S.L.: Everyone Interfaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) User Interfaces for All, pp. 115–133. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. W3C Recommendation (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
- 9.Fleming, B., Lin, A., Philips, B., Caves, K., Cotts, M.: Morse code demystified: A powerful alternative for access to AAC and computers. Paper Presented at CSUN 2003 (2003), http://www.csun.edu/cod/conf/2003/proceedings/71.htm
- 11.Huenerfauth, M., Hanson, V.L.: Sign Language in the Interface: Access for Deaf Signers. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) The Universal Access Handbook, pp. 38-1 – 38-18. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)Google Scholar
- 12.Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
- 13.Dowden, P., Cook, A.M.: Choosing effective selection techniques for beginning communicators. In: Reichle, J., Beukelman, D.R., Light, J.C. (eds.) Exemplary Practices for Beginning Communicators, pp. 395–429. Brookes, Baltimore (2002)Google Scholar