Uncovering the Effects of Cultural Intelligence on Cross-Cultural Virtual Collaboration Processes

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8024)


People from different countries are increasingly working together with the support of information and communication technologies. Such cross-cultural virtual collaboration is highly challenging due to the geographical separation and cultural diversity among collaborators. This study investigates the effects of an individual capability, cultural intelligence, on cross-cultural virtual collaboration processes in a controlled experiment. Thirty-five cross-cultural virtual dyads were formed and instructed to collaborate in a proposal writing task. Their interaction processes were analyzed with Bales’ Interaction Process Analysis. The results suggest that individuals with higher CQ demonstrated more positive reactions and attempted answers in the cross-cultural virtual collaboration after controlling for foreign language proficiency. The increased amounts of the two categories of interaction acts led to improved peer satisfaction. The study links CQ with proximal behavioral outcomes and identifies CQ as a key individual capability that predicts behaviors and affective outcomes in cross-cultural virtual collaboration.


Cultural intelligence cross-cultural communication cross-cultural collaboration Bales’ interaction process analysis global virtual team 


  1. 1.
    Powell, A., Piccoli, G., Ives, B.: Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 35, 6–36 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martins, L.L., Schilpzand, M.C.: Global Virtual Teams: Key Developments, Research Gaps, and Future Directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 30, 1–72 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peters, L., Karren, R.J.: An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group & Organization Management 34, 479–504 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shachaf, P.: Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information & Management 45, 131–142 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garrison, G., Wakefield, R.L., Xu, X., Kim, S.H.: Globally distributed teams: the effect of diversity on trust, cohesion and individual performance. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 41, 27–48 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goodbody, J.: Critical success factors for global virtual teams. Strategic Communication Management 9, 18–21 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chua, R.Y.J., Morris, M.W., Mor, S.: Collaborating across cultures: Cultural metacognition and affect-based trust in creative collaboration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 118, 116–131 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Earley, P.C., Ang, S.: Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions across Cultures. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ng, K.-Y., Van Dyne, L., Ang, S.: Cultural intelligence: A review, reflections, and recommendations for future research. In: Ryan, A.M., Leong, F.T.L., Oswald, F. (eds.) Conducting Multinational Research: Applying Organizational Psychology in the Workplace, pp. 29–58. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, Y., Li, H., Maedche, A., Rau, P.-L.P.P.: Are You a Trustworthy Partner in a Cross-cultural Virtual Environment?– Behavioral Cultural Intelligence and Receptivity-based Trust in Virtual Collaboration. In: 4th International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration, pp. 87–96 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ang, S., Banker, R., Bapna, R., Slaughter, S.A., Wattal, S.: Human Capital of IT Professionals: A Research Agenda. In: ICIS 2011 Panel (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Webster, J.: Comparing virtual teams to traditional teams: An identification of new research opportunities. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 25, 181–215 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K.Y., Templer, K.J., Tay, C., Chandrasekar, N.A.: Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and Effects on Cultural Judgment and Decision Making, Cultural Adaptation and Task Performance. Management and Organization Review 3, 335–371 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rockstuhl, T., Ng, K.: The effects of cultural intelligence on interpersonal trust in multicultural teams. In: Ang, S., Van Dyne, L. (eds.) Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory Measurment and Applications, pp. 206–220. M.E. Sharpe (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beyene, T., Hinds, P.: Fluency As Stigma: Implications of a Language Mandat. In: Global Work, Unpulished Ph.D. Thesis (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Imai, L., Gelfand, M.J.: The culturally intelligent negotiator: The impact of cultural intelligence (CQ) on negotiation sequences and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 112, 83–98 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koh, C., Joseph, D., Ang, S.: Cultural intelligence and collaborative work: intercultural competencies in global technology work teams. In: 2009 International Workshop on Intercultural Collaboration, pp. 261–264 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beck, R., Gregory, R., Prifling, M.: Cultural Intelligence and Project Management Interplay in IT Offshore Outsourcing Projects. In: ICIS 2008 Proceedings. Paper 44 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gregory, R., Prifling, M., Beck, R.: The role of cultural intelligence for the emergence of negotiated culture in IT offshore outsourcing projects. Information Technology & People 22, 223–241 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldfinch, T., Layton, C., Gardner, A., Thomas, G., Henderson, A., McCarthy, T.: Observing cultural interactions in engineering design projects. In: Proceedings of the 2011 AAEE Conference, pp. 184–190 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bales, R.F.: Definitions of the interaction categories. Interaction process analysis, pp. 99–135. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaw, M.E., Ackerman, B., McCown, N.E., Worsham, A.P., Haugh, L.D., Gebhardt, B.M., Small, P.A.: Interaction Patterns and Facilitation of Peer Learning. Small Group Research 10, 214–223 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shwarts-Asher, D., Ahituv, N., Etzion, D.: Modeling the characteristics of virtual teams’ structure. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining 4, 195–212 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richter, S., Lechner, U.: Communication content relations to coordination and trust over time: a computer game perspective. In: 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pp. 60–68 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hautasaari, A.: Machine translation effects on group interaction: an intercultural collaboration experiment. In: 3rd International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dekker, D.M., Rutte, C.G., Van den Berg, P.T.: Cultural Differences in the Perception of Critical Interaction Behaviors in Global Virtual Teams. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 32, 441–452 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kauffeld, S., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N.: Meetings Matter: Effects of Team Meetings on Team and Organizational Success. Small Group Research 3, 130–158 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dyne, L., Van, A.S., Koh, C.: Development and Validation of the CQS. In: Ang, S., Van Dyne, L. (eds.) Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory Measurment and Applications, pp. 16–38. M.E. Sharpe (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hardin, A.M., Fuller, M.A., Davison, R.M.: I Know I Can, But Can We?: Culture and Efficacy Beliefs in Global Virtual Teams. Small Group Research 38, 130–155 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fornell, C., Bookstein, F.L.: Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research 19, 440–452 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Falk, R., Miller, N.: A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Information Systems IVUniversity of MannheimGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Enterprise SystemsUniversity of MannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations