Advertisement

Towards Automated Analysis of Student Arguments

  • Nancy L. Green
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7926)

Abstract

This paper presents the approach to automated analysis of student argument diagrams to be used in the Genetics Argumentation Inquiry Learning (GAIL) system. Student arguments are compared to expert arguments automatically generated using an existing argument generator developed previously for the GenIE Assistant project. A prototype argument analyzer was implemented for GAIL. Weaknesses in student arguments are identified using non-domain-specific, non-content-specific rules that recognize common error types.

Keywords

Educational Argumentation Systems Genetics Education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Green, N.: A Bayesian network coding scheme for annotating biomedical information presented to genetic counseling clients. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 38, 130–144 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Green, N., Dwight, R., Navoraphan, K., Stadler, B.: Natural language generation of transparent arguments for lay audiences. Argument and Computation 2(1), 23–50 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., Carr, C.S. (eds.): Visualizing Argumentation. Springer, London (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M. (eds.): Educational Technologies for Teaching Argumentation Skills. Bentham Science Publishers, Sharjah (2012)Google Scholar
  5. Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., McLaren, B.M.: Computer-Supported Argumentation: A Review of the State of the Art. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5(1), 43–102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Scheuer, O., McLaren, B.M., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N.: Automated Analysis and Feedback Techniques to Support and Teach Argumentation: A Survey. In: Pinkwart, McLaren (eds.) Educational Technologies for Teaching Argumentation Skills (2012)Google Scholar
  7. Toulmin, S.E.: The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  8. Walton, D., Reed, C., Macagno, F.: Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy L. Green
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations