Advertisement

Research Goals for Evolving the ‘Form’ User Interface Metaphor towards More Interactivity

  • Johannes Harms
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7946)

Abstract

Forms have been static, document-like user interfaces (UIs) for centuries. This work proposes to evolve the ‘form’ UI metaphor towards more interactivity. Related work has proposed interactive form elements such as autocompleting or otherwise assistive input fields. But a unified concept and scientific reflection on the topic are missing. Methodologically, this work first provides a deeper understanding of forms as UI metaphor. It then presents relevant research goals for improved usability, including collaborative form filling, easier navigation in long forms, and combined input fields for comfortable data entry. Taken together, the contributions of this work are to provide a deeper understanding of forms, systematically highlight relevant research topics, and hopefully foster a scientific discussion in form design.

Keywords

Form Design Web Forms HCI Usability User Interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wroblewski, L.: Web Form Design. Filling the Blanks. Louis Rosenfeld (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nielsen, J.: Forms vs. Applications (2005), http://www.nngroup.com/articles/forms-vs-applications/
  3. 3.
    Jarrett, C., Gaffney, G.: Forms that work. Morgan Kaufmann (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bargas-Avila, J., Brenzikofer, O., Roth, S., Tuch, A., Orsini, S., Opwis, K.: Simple but crucial user interfaces in the world wide web: Introducing 20 guidelines for usable web form design. In: Matrai, R. (ed.) User Interfaces, ch.1. InTech (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frohlich, D., Crossfield, Gilbert: Requirements for an intelligent form-filling interface. In: People and Computers: Designing the Interface, pp. 102–116 (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tjin-Kam-Jet, K., Trieschnigg, D., Hiemstra, D.: Free-text search over complex Web Forms. In: Hanbury, A., Rauber, A., de Vries, A.P. (eds.) IRFC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6653, pp. 94–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tange, H.J., Hasman, A., de Vries Robbé, P.F., Schouten, H.C.: Medical Narratives in Electronic Medical Records. Int. J. Med. Inform. 46, 7–29 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sturm, J., Boves, L.: Effective error recovery strategies for multimodal form-filling applications. Speech Communication 45(3), 289–303 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobs, S., Gebhardt, M., Kethers, S., Rzasa, W.: Filling HTML forms simultaneously: CoWeb architecture and functionality. In: Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 28(7-11), pp. 1385–1395. Elsevier (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amrhein, D., Ivory, A.: Enable a Collaborative Experience for Html Forms. IBM (2010), http://ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-twowayforms/
  11. 11.
    Strobl, S., Bernhart, M., Grechenig, T.: An Experience Report on the Incremental Adoption and Evolution of an SPL in eHealth. In: Proc. 2010 ICSE Workshop on Product Line Approaches in Software Engineering, pp. 16–23. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alty, J., Knott, R., Anderson, B., Smyth, M.: A framework for engineering metaphor at the user interface. In: Interacting with Computers, vol. 13(2), pp. 301–322 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barr, P., Biddle, R., Noble, J.: A Semiotic Model of User-Interface Metaphor. In: Virtual, Distributed and Flexible Organisations, pp. 189–215. Springer (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Card, S., Nation, D.: Degree-of-Interest Trees: A Component of an Attention-Reactive User Interface. In: Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2002, pp. 231–245. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holzinger, A., Baernthaler, M., Pammer, W., Katz, H., Bjelic-Radisic, V., Ziefle, M.: Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: Performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69(9), 563–570 (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Card, S., Mackinlay, J., Shneiderman, B.: Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Harms
    • 1
  1. 1.INSO Research GroupVienna Univ. of TechnologyAustria

Personalised recommendations