Advertisement

The Impact of User Diversity on the Willingness to Disclose Personal Information in Social Network Services

A Comparison of Private and Business Contexts
  • Anne Kathrin Schaar
  • André Calero Valdez
  • Martina Ziefle
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7946)

Abstract

Social media and social network sites (SNS) are a central medium for communication within the Internet. There has never been a faster possibility for information exchange across the globe with a comparable range and size of audience. So far, SNS are very popular in private communication. But can other fields of application profit from this role model? To find out more about the comparability of the two contexts (private and business) and to specify transferable design guidelines, we investigated the willingness to disclose private data in both private and business context, knowing that data disclosure is one significant success factor for SNS and communities. Therefore, an exploratory questionnaire study (N = 151) was designed. The focus of the study is based on the question whether there is a difference between the contexts and whether these differences are related to user diversity factors (age, gender, perceived locus of control over technology (PLoC), and personality traits according to Five Factor Model (FFM)). First results reveal that there is a significant difference between the two contexts that is hard to explain using only factors of user diversity.

Keywords

Demographic change FFM social network sites self-disclosure personality technology acceptance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buck, H., Kistler, E., Mendius, H.G.: Demographischer wandel in der arbeitswelt: Chancen für eine innovative arbeitsgestaltung (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher (ed.): More Years, More Life: Recommendations of the Joint Academy Initiative on Aging, 1. Auflage. Nova Acta Leopoldina N.F., vol. 108. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloom, D.E., Canning, D.: Global demographic change: Dimensions and economic significance. Working Paper 10817, National Bureau of Economic Research (October 2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft Köln: Die Zukunft der Arbeit in Deutschland: Megatrends, Reformbedarf und Handlungsoptionen. IW-Studien. Dt. Inst.-Verl., Köln (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sullivan, S.E.: The changing nature of careers: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 25(3), 457–484 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osterland, M.: Normalbiographie und Normalarbeitsverhältnis (1989)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reitzle, M., Körner, A., Vondracek, F.W.: Psychological and demographic correlates of career patterns. Journal of Vocational Behavior 74(3), 308–320 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hill, E.J., Ferris, M., Märtinson, V.: Does it matter where you work? a comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior 63(2), 220–241 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Venkatesh, A., Vitalari, N.P.: An emerging distributed work arrangement: an investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science 38(12), 1687–1706 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bailey, D.E., Kurland, N.B.: A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(4), 383–400 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340 (1989)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 53(1), 59–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Correa, T., Hinsley, A.W., De Zuniga, H.G.: Who interacts on the web?: The intersection of users personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior 26(2), 247–253 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bothorel, C., Lohr, C., Thépaut, A., Bonnaud, F., Cabasse, G.: From individual communication to social networks: evolution of a technical platform for the elderly. Toward Useful Services for Elderly and People with Disabilities, 145–152 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M.: State of the (net) work address developing criteria for applying social networking to the work environment. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 41, 3459–3467 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koch, M., Richter, A.: Enterprise 2.0: Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen. Oldenbourg Verlag (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Ebner, M.: Interactive technology for enhancing distributed learning: a study on weblogs. In: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology, BCS-HCI 2009, pp. 309–312. British Computer Society, Swinton (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richter, A., Stocker, A., Mller, S., Avram, G.: Knowledge management goals revisited – a cross-sectional analysis of social software adoption in corporate environments. In: ACIS 2011 Proceedings (January 2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.: Neo five-factor inventory. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa (1991)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The neo personality inventory. Psychological Assessment 4(1), 5 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rammstedt, B., John, O.P.: Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the big five inventory in english and german. Journal of Research in Personality 41(1), 203–212 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Kathrin Schaar
    • 1
  • André Calero Valdez
    • 1
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 1
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction CenterRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations