Music Genre Classification: A Semi-supervised Approach

  • Soujanya Poria
  • Alexander Gelbukh
  • Amir Hussain
  • Sivaji Bandyopadhyay
  • Newton Howard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7914)

Abstract

Music genres can be seen as categorical descriptions used to classify music basing on various characteristics such as instrumentation, pitch, rhythmic structure, and harmonic contents. Automatic music genre classification is important for music retrieval in large music collections on the web. We build a classifier that learns from very few labeled examples plus a large quantity of unlabeled data, and show that our methodology outperforms existing supervised and unsupervised approaches. We also identify salient features useful for music genre classification. We achieve 97.1% accuracy of 10-way classification on real-world audio collections.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Cambria, E., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Enriching SenticNet polarity scores through semi-supervised fuzzy clustering. IEEE ICDM, Brussels, 709–716 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Enhanced SenticNet with affective labels for concept-based opinion mining. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2013), doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.4Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, C., Shih, J., Yu, K., Lin, H.: Automatic music genre classification based on modulation spectral analysis of spectral and cepstral features. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 11(4) (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scaringella, N., Zoia, G.: Automatic genre classification of music content: a survey. Signal Processing Magazine 23(2), 133–141 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shao, X., Xu, C., Kankanhalli, M.: Unsupervised classification of musical genre using hidden Markov model. In: IEEE Int. Conf. of Multimedia Explore (ICME), Taiwan (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rauber, A., Pampalk, E., Merkl, D.: Using psycho-acoustic models and self-organizing maps to create a hierarchical structuring of music by sound similarity. In: 3rd Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval, France (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pampalk, E., Flexer, A., Widmer, G.: Improvements of audio based music similarity and genre classification? In: 6th Int. Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, UK, (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scaringella, N., Zoia, G.: On the modeling of time information for automatic genre recognition systems in audio signals. In: 6th Int. Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, UK (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soltau, H., Schultz, T., Westphal, M., Waibel, A.: Recognition of music types. In: IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), USA (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mandel, M., Ellis, D.: Song-level features and support vector machines for music classification. In: 6th Int. Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, UK (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lidy, T., Rauber, A.: Evaluation of feature extractors and psycho-acoustic transformationsfor music genre classification. In: 6th Int. Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, UK, (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scaringella, N., Mlynek, D.: A mixture of support vector machines for audio classification. Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) (2005), website, www.music-ir.org/evaluation/mirexresults/articles/audio_genre/scaringella.pdf
  13. 13.
    Berenzweig, A., Ellis, D., Lawrence, S.: Using voice segments to improve artist classification of music. In: AES 22nd International Conference on Virtual, Synthetic and Entertainment Audio (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peeters, G.: A large set of audio features for sound description (similarity and classification) in the CUIDADO project. CUIDADO I.S.T. Project Report (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saunders, J.: Real time discrimination of broadcast speech/music. In: Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 993–996 (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wold, E., Blum, T., Keislar, D., Wheaton, J.: Content-based classification,search, and retrieval of audio. IEEE Multimedia 3(2) (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    MPEG-7, “Information Technology – Multimedia Content Description Interface – Part 4: Audio”, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC29, ISO/IEC FDIS 15938-4:2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meng, A., Ahrendt, P., Larsen, J.: Improving music genre classification by short-time feature integration. In: 6th Int. Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, UK (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tzanetakis, G.: Music Genre Classification of Audio Signal. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 10(5) (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McEnnis, D., McKay, C., Fujinaga, I., Depalle, P.: Jaudio: A Feature Extraction Library. In: ISMIR 2005(2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algoritms. Plenum Press, New York (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explorations 11(1) (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu, Y., Zhang, C., Yang, C.: Semi-supervised classification of musical genre using multi-view features. In: International Computer Music Conference ICMC (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yaslan, Y., Zehra, C.: Audio genre classification with semi-supervised feature ensemble learning. In: 2nd International Workshop on Machine Learning and Music (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cambria, E., Song, Y., Wang, H., Howard, N.: Semantic multi-dimensional scaling for open-domain sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2013), doi:10.1109/MIS.2012.118Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cambria, E., Hussain, A.: Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications, pp. 978–994. Springer, Dordrecht (2012) ISBN: 978-94-007-5069-2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soujanya Poria
    • 1
  • Alexander Gelbukh
    • 2
  • Amir Hussain
    • 3
  • Sivaji Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
  • Newton Howard
    • 4
  1. 1.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentJadavpur UniversityIndia
  2. 2.CICInstituto Politécnico NacionalDF, MexicoMexico
  3. 3.Dept. of Computing Science and MathematicsUniversity of StirlingUnited Kingdom
  4. 4.Brain Science FoundationUSA

Personalised recommendations