Open Standards and Open Source in Swedish Schools: On Promotion of Openness and Transparency

  • Björn Lundell
  • Jonas Gamalielsson
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 404)

Abstract

We draw from a study aimed to establish the state of practice concerning schools’ expectations and provision of IT and software applications in Swedish schools. Analysis focuses on Open Standards and Open Source Software (OSS), and considers educational lock-in. Results consider schools’ expectations and provision of software and standards for digital artefacts, and show that schools expect students to use a variety of different software systems including a number of well-known OSS. The study reveals significant misconceptions concerning standards and software applications, characterises problems, and presents some recommendations for action.

References

  1. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., Kefala, S.: The ICT Impact Report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe, European Schoolnet (December 11, 2006) Google Scholar
  2. DeNardis, L., Tam, E.: Open Documents and Democracy: a Political basis for Open Document Standards, Yale Information Society Project, Yale ISP White Paper (November 1, 2007), Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1028073
  3. EC: Digital Agenda: Annual scoreboard confirms need for structural economic reform across Europe and surplus of ICT jobs; big trend towards mobile services and technology, European Commission, IP/12/614, Press Release, Brussels (June 18, 2012) Google Scholar
  4. Egyedi, T.: Standard-compliant, but incompatible?! Computer Standards & Interfaces 29(6), 605–613 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. EU: European Interoperability Framework for pan-European eGovernment Services, European Commission, Version 1.0 (2004), http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doca2cd.pdf?id=19528
  6. EU: From an IT policy for society to a policy for the information society, European Commission (June 30, 2005), http://www.epractice.eu/files/media/media_208.pdf
  7. EU: Guidelines for Public Procurement of ICT Goods and Services: SMART 2011/0044, D2 - Overview of Procurement Practices,” Final Report, Europe Economics, London (March 1, 2012), http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/ssai/docs/study-action23/d2-finalreport-29feb2012.pdf
  8. FLOSS: Use of Open Source Software in Firms and Public Institutions : Evidence from Germany, Sweden and UK , FLOSS Final Report - Part 1, FLOSS – Free/Libre Open Source Software: Survey and Study, Berlin (July 2002) Google Scholar
  9. FRAND: Implementing FRAND standards in Open Source: Business as usual or mission impossible?, EC Workshop, impossible?, Report of FRAND and OS event, Brussels, Belgium (November 22, 2012), http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/ict/files/ict-policies/report-from-frand-os-conference-22nov12_en.pdf
  10. Ghosh, R.A.: Open Standards and Interoperability Report: An Economic Basis for Open Standards, FLOSSPOLS, Deliverable D4 (December 12, 2005) Google Scholar
  11. German, D.: Experiences teaching a graduate course in Open Source Software Engineering. In: Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Open Source Systems, Genova, Italy, July 11-15, pp. 326–328 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Hatt, A.-K.: Från Lahore till Ale - It i elevernas tjänst, Public Speech at: ‘It i skola och utbildning’, Nordiska skolledarkongressen, Gothenburg (March 29, 2012a), www.regeringen.se/sb/d/13698/a/189703
  13. Hatt, A.-K.: Vartenda barn har rätt till modern it i skolan, Public Speech at: ‘Internetdagarna’, Stockholm Water Front Congress Centre (October 23, 2012b), http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/13698/a/202226
  14. IES: Teachers’ Use of Educational technology in U.S. Public Schools: 2009, National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2010-040, U.S. Department of Education (May 2009) Google Scholar
  15. Kilamo, T.: The Community Game: Learning Open Source Development Through Participatory Exercise. In: Proc. of AMT 2010, Tampere, Finland. ACM Press (October 2010)Google Scholar
  16. Kirk, J.: Microsoft to fund IT training in developing world, IT worldcanada.com, IDG News (January 23, 2008) Google Scholar
  17. Kroes, N.: Being Open About Standards, Brussels, SPEECH/08/317, European Commissioner for Competition Policy (June 10, 2008) Google Scholar
  18. Lin, Y.-W., Zini, E.: Free/libre open source software implementations in schools: Evidence from the field and implications for the future. Computers & Education 50(3), 1092–1102 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Livingstone, S.: Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education 38(1), 9–24 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundell, B., Persson, A., Lings, B.: Learning Through Practical Involvement in the OSS Ecosystem: Experiences from a Masters Assignment. In: Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Scacchi, W., Sillitti, A. (eds.) Open Source Development, Adoption and Innovation. IFIP, vol. 234, pp. 289–294. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lundell, B.: e-Governance in public sector ICT procurement: what is shaping practice in Sweden? European Journal of ePractice 12(6) (2011), www.epractice.eu/en/document/5290101
  22. Lundell, B.: Why do we need Open Standards? In: Orviska, M., Jakobs, K. (eds.) Proceedings 17th EURAS Annual Standardisation Conference ‘Standards and Innovation’, Aachen. The EURAS Baard Series, pp. 227–240 (2012) ISBN: 978-3-86130-337-4Google Scholar
  23. Lundell, B.: IT Usage in Swedish Primary Schools: Observations on Innovation and Educational Lock-In. In: Coughlan, S. (ed.) The First OpenForum Academy Conference Proceedings, OpenForum Europe, pp. 15–21 (2012b) ISBN: 978-1-300-17718-0Google Scholar
  24. Näringsdepartementet: Rundabordssamtal om it i skola och undervisning, Näringsdepartementet (February 18, 2011), www.regeringen.se/sb/d/14390/a/161358
  25. Odell, M.: Innovations for Europe: Increasing Public Value, Public Speech at: ‘European Public Sector Award’, Maastricht (November 5, 2009), http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/11678/a/134858
  26. Regeringen: Kommittédirektiv: Delegation för e-förvaltning, Dir. 2009:19 (March 26, 2009), http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/12/40/02/ec50b88b.pdf
  27. SKL: IT en rättighet för elever, Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting, Stockholm (2011), http://www.skl.se/press/debattartiklar/debattartiklar-2011/it-en-rattighet-for-elever
  28. Skolinspektionen: Avgifter i skolan, Informationsblad, Skolinspektionen (December 7, 2011), http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/vagledning/infoblad-avgifter.pdf
  29. Skolverket: Redovisning av uppdrag om uppföljning av IT-användning och IT- kompetens i förskola, skola och vuxenutbildning, Skolverket, Stockholm, Dnr 75-2007:3775 (April 9, 2010) Google Scholar
  30. Skolverket: Hur laddar jag ned dokument från Skolverkets webbplats? , Skolverket (May 19, 2011), http://www.skolverket.se/2.2467/2.2472/2.2475/2.2476/hur-laddar-jag-ned-dokument-fran-skolverkets-webbplats-1.10294
  31. SOU: Strategi för myndigheternas arbete med e-förvaltning, Statens Offentliga Utredningar: SOU 2009:86, e-Delegationen, Finansdepartementet, Regeringskansliet, Stockholm (October 19, 2009), http://www.sweden.gov.se/content/1/c6/13/38/13/1dc00905.pdf
  32. UK: Open Standards Principles: For software interoperability, data and document formats in government IT specifications, Cabinett Office, UK (November 1, 2012), http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Open-Standards-Principles-FINAL.pdf

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn Lundell
    • 1
  • Jonas Gamalielsson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SkövdeSkövdeSweden

Personalised recommendations