Innovation in Government Services: The Case of Open Data

  • Zhenbin Yang
  • Atreyi Kankanhalli
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 402)

Abstract

Governments are initiating open data initiatives as a new approach where external stakeholders can play an increased role in the innovation of government services. This is unlike previous approaches of e-government service innovation where services are solely initiated and developed by the agencies themselves. However, despite public agencies actively promoting the use of their data by organizing events such as challenge competitions, the response from external stakeholders to leverage government data for innovative activities has been lacking. This raises the question about the reasons inhibiting the interest to innovate using open data. Yet, the existing literature points to a lack of understanding about external stakeholders’ willingness to innovate with the data provided. Motivated thus, this paper aims to identify the antecedents of the willingness of external stakeholders to innovate with open data. We propose the use of the case study methodology for this purpose.

Keywords

Open data eGovernment open innovation open government data 

References

  1. Bommert, B.: Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. International Public Management Review 11(1), 15–33 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Boudreau, K., Lakhani, K.: How to Manage Outside Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 50(4), 69–76 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Innovation. In: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Business Models – How to Thrive in a New Competitive Landscape. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  5. Chesbrough, H.W.: Open Services Innovation – Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies, A., Lithwick, D.: Government 2.0 and Access to Information: 2. Recent Developments in Proactive Disclosure and Open Data in the United States and Other Countries (Background paper) (2010), http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-15-e.pdf
  7. Den Hertog, P., Aa, W.V.D., De Jong, M.W.: Capabilities for Managing Service Innovation: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Service Management 21(4), 490–514 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Difranzo, D., Graves, A., Erickson, J.S., Ding, L., Michaelis, J., Lebo, T., Patton, E., Williams, G.T., Li, X., Zheng, J.G., Flores, J., McGuinness, D.L., Hendler, J.: The Web is My Back-end: Creating Mashups with Linked Open Government Data. In: Wood, D. (ed.) Linking Government Data, pp. 205–219. Springer, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission.: Pricing of Public Sector Information Study: Open Data Portals (E), Final Report (2011), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/report/11_2012/open_data_portals.pdf
  10. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E.: Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. Paper Presented at the R&D Management Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Herriott, R.E., Firestone, W.A.: Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability. Educational Researcher 12(2), 14–19 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huijboom, N., den Broek, T.V.: Open Data: An International Comparison of Strategies. European Journal of ePractice 12, 4–16 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Janssen, K.: The Influence of the PSI Directive on Open Government Data: An Overview of Recent Developments. Government Information Quarterly 28(4), 446–456 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management 29(4), 258–268 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: Open Government Data: A Stage Model. In: Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J., Wimmer, M.A., Tan, Y.-h. (eds.) EGOV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6846, pp. 235–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keupp, M.M., Gassmann, O.: Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation. R&D Management 39(4), 331–341 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuk, G., Davies, T.: The Roles of Agency and Artifacts in Assembling Open Data Complementarities. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai (2011)Google Scholar
  18. Lee, S.M., Hwang, T., Choi, D.: Open Innovation in the Public Sector of Leading Countries. Management Decision 50(1), 147–162 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nam, T.: New Ends, New Means, but Old Attitudes: Citizens’ Views on Open Government and Government 2.0. Paper Presented at the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2011)Google Scholar
  20. Nam, T., Sayogo, D.S.: Government 2.0 Collects the Wisdom of Crowds. Social Informatics, 51–58 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. Rossel, P., Finger, M., Misuraca, G.: Mobile e-Government Options: Between Technology-Driven and User-centric. The Electronic Journal of e-Government 4(2), 79–86 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. Vickery, G.: Review of Recent Studies on PSI Re-Use and Related Market Developments (2011), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/report/final_version_study_psi.docx
  23. Ye., H., Kankanhalli, A., Yang, Z.: Knowledge Brokering for Open Innovation: A Case Study of Innovation Intermediaries. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhenbin Yang
    • 1
  • Atreyi Kankanhalli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations