Advertisement

Assessment of Agile Maturity Models: A Multiple Case Study

  • Ozden Ozcan-Top
  • Onur Demirörs
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 349)

Abstract

Agile methods are welcomed by software community in recent years. The move from traditional methods to agile methods is not straightforward. Software organizations need assistance to achieve transition from traditional software development approaches to agile approaches and to improve their agile capability. During the last few years several agile maturity models/frameworks are developed to guide organizations in agile process improvement and agile adoption. In this study, we assess the strengths and weaknesses of agile maturity models/frameworks from agile process assessment and agile process improvement perspectives. To assess the models we have applied the models in a selected software organization. We discuss the strengths and weakness of each model and provide suggestions for their utilization.

Keywords

Agile Maturity Models Agile Maturity Frameworks Agile Process Maturity Agile Assessment Models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ambler, S.W., Lines, M.: Disciplined Agile Delivery: A Practitioner’s Guide to Agile Software Delivery in the Enterprise. IBM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elssamadisy, A.: Agile adoption patterns: a roadmap to organizational success. Addison-Wesley Professional (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sidky, A.: A structured approach to adopting agile practices: The agile adoption framework. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patel, C., Ramachandran, M.: Agile Maturity Model (AMM): A Software Process Improvement framework for Agile Software Development Practices. International Journal of Software Engineering 2, 3–28 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yin, A., Figueiredo, S., Mira da Silva, M.: Scrum Maturity Model: Validation for IT organizations’ roadmap to develop software centered on the client role. In: The Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, ICSEA 2011, pp. 20–29 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benefield, R.: Seven Dimensions of Agile Maturity in the Global Enterprise: A Case Study. In: 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS, pp. 1–7 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Humble, J., Russell, R.: The Agile Maturity Model Applied to Building and Releasing Software (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malic, N.: Title (unpublished)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Proulx, M.: Yet Another Agile Maturity Model (AMM)– The 5 Levels of Maturity (2010), http://analytical-mind.com/2010/07/12/yet-another-agile-maturity-model-the-5-levels-of-maturity/
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Rout, T.P., Tuffley, A., Cahill, B.: CMMI Evaluation Capability Maturity Model Integration Mapping to ISO/IEC 15504-2:1998, Software Quality Institute, Griffith University (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kneuper, R.: CMMI: Capability Maturity Model Integration A Process Improvement Approach. Rocky Nook (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sidky, A., Arthur, J., Bohner, S.: A disciplined approach to adopting agile practices: the agile adoption framework. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering 3, 203–216 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ambler, S.: The Agile Scaling Model (ASM): Adapting Agile Methods for Complex Environments (2009), ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/sa/wh/n/raw14204usen/RAW14204USEN.PDF

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ozden Ozcan-Top
    • 1
  • Onur Demirörs
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatics InstituteMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations