How to Prevent Reinventing the Wheel? – Design Principles for Project Knowledge Management Systems

  • Silvia Schacht
  • Alexander Mädche
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7939)

Abstract

Today, many companies still struggle in documenting and reusing the knowledge gained by project teams. However, knowledge only creates value if it is applied. There exists a vast amount of research in the field of knowledge management focusing on documentation, storage and exchange of knowledge, but knowledge reuse is often omitted by researchers. The presented work aims to close this gap by developing a project knowledge management system enabling project teams to apply company-internal knowledge. We followed an action design research approach to explore meta-requirements in a case company, translate these requirements into design principles and test the design principles by evaluating an artifact of a project knowledge management system. By our work, the knowledge management research field can benefit since our design theory extends the existing body of knowledge. Furthermore, our research results are instantiated in a concrete artifact which can be directly transferred into practice.

Keywords

Project Knowledge Management System Knowledge Reuse Project Management Action Design Research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ajmal, M.M., Koskinen, K.U.: Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: An organizational culture perspective. Project Management Journal 39(1), 7–15 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hsu, J., Shih, S.-P., Chiang, J.C., Liu, J.: The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams’ coordination, communication, and performance. International Journal of Project Management 30(3), 329–340 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    PMI, IEEE Guide–Adoption of the Project Management Institute (PMI®) Standard A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 4th edn., IEEE Std 1490-2011, 1-508 (2011), http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=6086683
  4. 4.
    Julian, J.: How project management office leaders facilitate cross-project learning and continuous improvement. Project Management Journal 39(3), 43–58 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petter, S., Randolph, A.B.: Developing soft skills to manage user expectations in IT projects: Knowledge reuse among IT project managers. Project Management Journal 40(4), 45–59 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reich, B.H., Gemino, A., Sauer, C.: Modeling the knowledge perspective of IT projects. Project Management Journal 39, 4–14 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eskerod, P., Skriver, H.J.: Organizational culture restraining in-house knowledge transfer between project managers-A case study. Project Management Journal 38(1), 110–122 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, X., Hu, D., Davidson, R.M.: How microblog follower networks affect open source software project success. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 205 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petter, S., Vaishnavi, V.: Facilitating experience reuse among software project managers. Information Sciences 178(7), 1783–1802 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nesheim, T., Olsen, K.M., Tobiassen, A.E.: Knowledge communities in matrix-like organizations: managing knowledge towards application. Journal of Knowledge Management 15(5), 836–850 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choi, S.Y., Lee, H., Yoo, Y.: The Impact of Information Technology and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: A Field Study. MIS Quarterly 34(4), 855–870 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bostrom, R.P., Gupta, S., Thomas, D.: A meta-theory for understanding information systems within sociotechnical systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 26(1), 17–48 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Rikard, L.: Action design research. MIS Quarterly 35(1), 37–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: Soft Design Science Research: Extending the Boundaries of Evaluation in Design Science Research. In: DESRIST 2007 Proceedings, pp. 18–38 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iivari, J., Venable, J.R.: Action research and design science research-seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. In: ECIS 2009 Proceedings (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Järvinen, P.: Action Research is Similar to Design Science. Quality & Quantity 41(1), 37–54 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susman, G.I., Evered, R.D.: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23(4), 582–603 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baskerville, R., Myers, M.D.: Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS research relevant to practice. MIS Quarterly 28(3), 329–335 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davison, R., Martinsons, M.G., Kock, N.: Principles of canonical action re-search. Information Systems Journal 14(1), 65–86 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dickens, L., Watkins, K.: Action Research: Rethinking Lewin. Management Learning 30(2), 127–140 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.: Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36–60 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes. MIS Quarterly 26(3), 179–212 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tan, M., Teo, T.: Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the AIS 1(5), 1–42 (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coyne, I.T.: Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing 26(3), 623–630 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization 17(1), 2–26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomas, D.R.: A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 27(2), 237–246 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morse, J., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., Spiers, J.: Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1(2), 13–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rolfe, G.: Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 53(3), 304–310 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dourish, P., Edwards, W.K., LaMarca, A., Lamping, J., Petersen, K., Salisbury, M., Terry, D.B., et al.: Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 18(2), 140–170 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koskinen, K.U., Pihlanto, P., Vanharanta, H.: Tacit knowledge acquisition and sharing in a project work context. International Journal of Project Management 21(4), 281–290 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schindler, M., Eppler, M.J.: Harvesting project knowledge: a review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management 21, 219–228 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sutton, D.: What is knowledge and can it be managed? European Journal of Information Systems 10(2), 80–88 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wagner, C.: Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 13(1), 265–289 (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Arazy, O., Gellatly, I., Jang, S., Patterson, R.: Wiki Deployment in Corporate Settings. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 28(2), 57–64 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Argote, L., McEvily, B., Reagans, R.: Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science 49(4), 571–582 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wentling, T.: Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(1), 64–77 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Davenport, T.H., De Long, D.W., Beers, M.C.: Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review 39(2), 43–57 (1998)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Markus, M.L.: Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1), 57–93 (2001)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Newell, S.: Enhancing cross-project learning. Management 16(1), 12–20 (2004)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Desouza, K.C., Evaristo, J.R.: Managing knowledge in distributed projects. Communications of the ACM 47(4), 87–91 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wu, J.-H.: A design methodology for form-based knowledge reuse and representation. Information & Management 46(7), 365–375 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nielsen, L., Madsen, S.: Storytelling as method for sharing knowledge across IT projects. In: HICSS 2006 Proceedings (2006)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T.L., Yen, C.-H., Chang, C.-M.: Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(2), 153–169 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lin, H.-F.: Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science 33(2), 135–149 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bartsch, V., Ebers, M., Maurer, I.: Learning in project-based organizations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management 31(2), 239–251 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    King, W., Marks Jr., P., McCoy, S.: The most important issues in knowledge management. Communications of the ACM 45(9), 93–97 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dellarocas, C.: The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms. Management Science 49(10), 1407–1424 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Research Commentary–Platform Evolution: Co-evolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics. Information Systems Research 21(4), 675–687 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Popov, B., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanoff, D., Manov, D., Kirilov, A.: KIM – a semantic platform for information extraction and retrieval. Natural Language Engineering 10, 375–392 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tolone, W., Ahn, G., Pal, T., Hong, S.: Access Control in Collaborative Systems. ACM Computing Surveys 37(1), 29–41 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Schacht
    • 1
  • Alexander Mädche
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Chair of Information Systems IVUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Enterprise SystemsUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations