Training Interpreters Using Virtual Worlds

  • Panagiotis D. Ritsos
  • Robert Gittins
  • Sabine Braun
  • Catherine Slater
  • Jonathan C. Roberts
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7848)


With the rise in population migration there has been an increased need for professional interpreters who can bridge language barriers and operate in a variety of fields such as business, legal, social and medical. Interpreters require specialized training to cope with the idiosyncrasies of each field and their potential clients need to be aware of professional parlance. We present ‘Project IVY’. In IVY, users can make a selection from over 30 interpreter training scenarios situated in the 3D virtual world. Users then interpret the oral interaction of two avatar actors. In addition to creating different 3D scenarios, we have developed an asset management system for the oral files and permit users (mentors of the training interpreters) to easily upload and customize the 3D environment and observe which scenario is being used by a student. In this article we present the design and development of the IVY Virtual Environment and the asset management system. Finally we make discussion over our plans for further development.


Interpreting Virtual Environments Second Life Usability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kohn, K., Hoffstaedter, P., Widmann, J.: BACKBONE - Pedagogic Corpora for Content & Language Integrated Learning. In: Eurocall Conference Proceedings. Macmillan ELT (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Highsmith, J.: Agile software development ecosystems. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ritsos, P.D., Gittins, R., Roberts, J.C., Braun, S., Slater, C.: Using Virtual Reality for Interpreter-mediated Communication and Training. In: 2012 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), pp. 191–198. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonk, C., Graham, C.: The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, W., Vilhjalmsson, H., Marsella, S.: Serious games for language learning: How much game, how much AI. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, pp. 306–313 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Noyelles, A., Seo, K.K.J.: Inspiring equal contribution and opportunity in a 3D multi-user virtual environment: Bringing together men gamers and women non-gamers in Second Life. Computers & Education 58(1), 21–29 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yee, N.: The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15(3), 309–329 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., Trivedi, A.: Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An interdisciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education 53(1), 169–182 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bartle, R.: From MUDs to MMORPGs: The history of virtual worlds. In: International Handbook of Internet Research, pp. 23–39 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duncan, I., Miller, A., Jiang, S.: A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collins, C.: Looking to the future: Higher education in the Metaverse. Educause Review 43(5), 51–63 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seeber, K.: SIMON: An online clearing house for interpreter training materials. Technology and Teacher Education Annual 4, 2403 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansen, I., Shlesinger, M.: The silver lining: Technology and self-study in the interpreting classroom. Interpreting 9(1), 95–118 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Braun, S.: ELISA-a pedagogically enriched corpus for language learning purposes. In: Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy: New Resources, New Tools, New Methods (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandrelli, A., Jerez, M., et al.: The impact of Information and Communication Technology on interpreter training. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 1(2), 269–303 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warburton, S.: Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(3), 414–426 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jennings, N., Collins, C.: Virtual or Virtually U: Educational Institutions in Second Life. International Journal of Social Sciences 2(3), 180–186 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boulos, M., Hetherington, L., Wheeler, S.: Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information & Libraries Journal 24(4), 233–245 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ye, E., Fang, Y., Liu, C., Chang, T., Dinh, H.: Appalachian tycoon: an environmental education game in second life. In: Second Life Education Workshop 2007, vol. 72 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ryoo, J., Techatassanasoontorn, A., Lee, D.: Security education using Second Life. IEEE Security Privacy Magazine 7(2), 71–74 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ang, K., Wang, Q.: A case study of engaging primary school students in learning science by using Active Worlds. In: Proceedings of the First International LAMS Conference 2006: Designing the Future of Learning (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dickey, M.: Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(3), 439–451 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Prasolova-Førland, E.: Analyzing place metaphors in 3D educational collaborative virtual environments. Computers in Human Behavior 24(2), 185–204 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao, H., Sun, B., Wu, H., Hu, X.: Study on building a 3D interactive virtual learning environment based on OpenSim platform. In: 2010 International Conference on Audio Language and Image Processing (ICALIP), pp. 1407–1411. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Konstantinidis, A., Tsiatsos, T., Demetriadis, S., Pomportsis, A.: Collaborative learning in opensim by utilizing sloodle. In: 2010 Sixth Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications (AICT), pp. 90–95. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Savin-Baden, M., Gourlay, L., Tombs, C., Steils, N., Tombs, G., Mawer, M.: Situating pedagogies, positions and practices in immersive virtual worlds. Educational Research 52(2), 123–133 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thackray, L., Good, J., Howland, K.: Learning and teaching in Virtual Worlds: Boundaries, challenges and opportunities. In: Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds, pp. 139–158 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Salmon, G., Nie, M., Edirisingha, P.: Developing a five-stage model of learning in Second Life. Educational Research 52(2), 169–182 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carr, D., Oliver, M., Burn, A.: Learning, teaching and ambiguity in virtual worlds. In: Learning in Virtual Environments International Conference, vol. 83 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moschini, E.: The Second Life Researcher Toolkit–An exploration of in-world tools, methods and approaches for researching educational projects in Second Life. In: Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds, pp. 31–51 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tymczynska, M.: Integrating in-class and online learning activities in a healthcare interpreting course using Moodle. The Journal of Specialised Translation (12), 148–164 (2009)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dougiamas, M., Taylor, P.: Moodle: Using learning communities to create an open source course management system. In: Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, vol. 3 (2003)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Connolly, T., Boyle, E., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., Boyle, J.: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zender, R., Dressler, E., Lucke, U., Tavangarian, D.: Pervasive media and messaging services for immersive learning experiences. In: IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, PerCom 2009, pp. 1–6 (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blais, C., Brutzman, D., Horner, D., Nicklaus, M.: Web-based 3D technology for scenario authoring and visualization: The SAVAGE project. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC), NTSA (2001)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kemp, J., Livingstone, D., Bloomfield, P.: SLOODLE: Connecting VLE tools with emergent teaching practice in Second Life. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(3), 551–555 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Glinka, F., Ploss, A., Gorlatch, S., Müller-Iden, J.: High-level development of multiserver online games. Int. J. Comput. Games Technol. 2008, 3:1–3:16 (2008)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roberts, J.C., Gittins, R., Thomas, R.: Scale and the construction of real-world models in Second Life. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 2(3), 259–279 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gonze, L., Friedrich, M., Kaye, R.: XML shareable playlist format version 1 (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hix, D., Hartson, H.: Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product & process. John Wiley & Sons (1993)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brooke, J.: SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis (1996)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lindgaard, G., Chattratichart, J.: Usability Testing: What Have We Overlooked? In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), pp. 1415–1424. ACM Press, San Jose (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Scholfield, P.: Quantifying language: A researcher’s and teacher’s guide to gathering language data and reducing it to figures. Multilingual Matters Limited (1995)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24(6), 574–594 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Panëels, S.A., Ritsos, P.D., Rodgers, P.J., Roberts, J.C.: Prototyping 3D haptic data visualizations. Computers & Graphics 37(3), 179–192 (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Panëels, S.A., Roberts, J.C.: Review of designs for haptic data visualization. IEEE T. Haptics 3(12), 119–137 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panagiotis D. Ritsos
    • 1
  • Robert Gittins
    • 1
  • Sabine Braun
    • 2
  • Catherine Slater
    • 2
  • Jonathan C. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Bangor UniversityBangorUK
  2. 2.University of SurreySurreyUK

Personalised recommendations