Enabling Information Interoperability through Multi-domain Modeling

  • Georg Grossmann
  • Andreas Jordan
  • Rishi Muruganandha
  • Matt Selway
  • Markus Stumptner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 151)

Abstract

Flexible integration of information systems with heterogeneous data structures and interfaces has been an important IT research goal for decades. It is a fundamental requirement for enterprise transformation that the business knowledge captured in form of data and business processes can be integrated and adapted within and across enterprise boundaries. In this paper we present results of a model-driven interoperability approach in the asset management domain. The approach builds on multi-domain modeling principles and has been applied in three large use cases over the last 5 years. We show how information interoperability and enterprise transformation can benefit from multi-domain modeling and how it fits together with a design science approach.

Keywords

Domain modeling languages model-driven engineering meta modeling information transformation interoperability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., Machiraju, V.: Web Services – Concepts, Architecturse and Applications. Data Centric Systems and Applications (DCSA). Springer (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger, S., Grossmann, G., Stumptner, M., Schrefl, M.: Metamodel-Based Information Integration at Industrial Scale. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6395, pp. 153–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernstein, P.A., Madhavan, J., Rahm, E.: Generic Schema Matching, Ten Years Later. In: Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB), vol. 4(11), pp. 695–701 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhattacharya, K., Gerede, C., Hull, R., Liu, R., Su, J.: Towards Formal Analysis of Artifact-Centric Business Process Models. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 288–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braaksma, A.J.J(J.), Klingenberg, W(W.), van Exel, P.W.H.M(P.): A review of the use of asset information standards for collaboration in the process industry. Computers in Industry 62(3), 337–350 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bussler, C.: B2B Integration. Springer (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M. (eds.): Process-Aware Information Systems. John Wiley & Sons (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eyal, A., Milo, T.: Integrating and customizing heterogeneous e-commerce applications. The VLDB Journal 10, 16–38 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiatech. Advancing Interoperability for the Capital Projects Industry: A Vision Paper. Technical report, Fiatech (February 2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gallaher, M.P., O’Connor, A.C., Dettbarn Jr., J.L., Gilday, L.T.: Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. Technical report, NIST (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gregory, N.: Excellence in Asset Management. In: Proc. of WCEAM, pp. 682–691. Coxmoor Publishing (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grossmann, G., Stumptner, M., Mayer, W., Barlow, M.: A Service Oriented Architecture for Data Integration in Asset Management. In: Proc. of WCEAM. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harmsen, F., Proper, H.A.E., Kok, N.: Informed Governance of Enterprise Transformations. In: Proper, E., Harmsen, F., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) PRET 2009. LNBIP, vol. 28, pp. 155–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Science Research in Information Systems, ch. 2. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jordan, A., Grossmann, G., Mayer, W., Selway, M., Stumptner, M.: On the Application of Software Modelling Principles on ISO 15926. In: MODELS Workshop on Modelling of the Physical World (MOTPW), Innsbruck, Austria (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kappel, G., Schrefl, M.: Object/Behavior Diagrams. In: Proceedings IEEE ICDE, pp. 530–539. IEEE Press (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA explained - The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kobayashi, T., Tamaki, M., Komoda, N.: Business process integration as a solution to the implementation of supply chain management systems. Information and Management 40(8), 769–780 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mathew, J.: Engineering Asset Management – Trends, Drivers, Challenges and Advances. In: Proc. of WCEAM, pp. 59–74. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MIMOSA. Open Systems Architecture for Enterprise Application Integration 3.2.3. Technical report, MIMOSA (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Papazoglou, M.P., van den Heuvel, W.-J.: Business process development life cycle methodology. CACM 50(10), 79–85 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pinkston, J.: The Ins and Outs of Integration - How EAI differs from B2B Integration. eAI Journal 8, 48–52 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stumptner, M., Schrefl, M., Grossmann, G.: On the road to behavior-based integration. In: Proc. APCCM. CRPIT Series, vol. 31, pp. 15–22. ACS (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thoo, E., Friedman, T., Beyer, M.A.: Magic Quadrant for Data Integration Tools. Technical report, Gartner (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Young, N., Jones, S.: SmartMarket Report: Interoperability in Construction Industry. Technical report, McGraw Hill, New York (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Grossmann
    • 1
  • Andreas Jordan
    • 1
  • Rishi Muruganandha
    • 1
  • Matt Selway
    • 1
  • Markus Stumptner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations