Meta-ensembles of Classifiers for Alzheimer’s Disease Detection Using Independent ROI Features

  • Borja Ayerdi
  • Alexandre Savio
  • Manuel Graña
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7931)

Abstract

Due to its growing social impact, prodromal detection of Alzheimer’s disease is of paramount importance. Biomarkers based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are one of the most sought results in the neuroscience community. In this paper we evaluate several ensembles of classifiers trained and tested in a two level ensemble scheme as follows: the 116 regions of interest (ROI) of the Anatomical Automatic Labeling (AAL) brain atlas are used to compute disjoint feature sets from the Grey-matter probability maps from the segmentation of the T1 weighted MRI of each subject; ROI features are the summary statistics inside this ROI; one ensemble of classifiers is trained on each independent ROI feature data set; the final classification of each subject is given by the combination of the classifications of each ROI, as meta-ensemble classifier. Experiments are performed on the 416 subjects (316 controls and 100 patients) of the OASIS database. We perform a hold-out of the 20% of the data for model selection, computing a leave-one-out validation on the 80% remaining data. Results are computed without circularity. Tested classifiers are the Extreme Learning Machines (ELM), Bootstrapped Dendritic Computing (BDC), Hybrid Extreme Random Forest (HERF) and Random Forest (RF). The best performance achieved is 80.8% accuracy, 77.1% specificity and 92.5% specificity with BDC. We also report the most discriminant ROIs obtained in the model selection phase.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chyzhyk, D., Graña, M., et al.: Hybrid dendritic computing with kernel-LICA applied to Alzheimer’s disease detection in MRI. Neurocomputing 75(1), 72–77 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davatzikos, C., Fan, Y., et al.: Detection of prodromal alzheimer’s disease via pattern classification of MRI. Neurobiology of Aging 29(4), 514–523 (2008) PMID: 17174012 PMCID: 2323584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, T., Rangarajan, A., et al.: CAVIAR: Classification via aggregated regression and its application in classifying OASIS brain database. In: Proceedings/IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 1337–1340 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu, M., Zhang, D., et al.: Ensemble sparse classification of alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 60(2), 1106–1116 (2012) PMID: 22270352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Varol, E., Gaonkar, B., et al.: Feature ranking based nested support vector machine ensemble for medical image classification. In: 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), pp. 146–149 (May 2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marcus, D.S., Wang, T.H., et al.: Open access series of imaging studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(9), 1498–1507 (2007) PMID: 17714011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., et al.: Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 15(1), 273–289 (2002) PMID: 11771995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, G.B., Zhu, Q.Y., Siew, C.K.: Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications. Neurocomputing 70(1-3), 489–501 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chyzhyk, D.: Bootstrapped dendritic classifiers for alzheimer’s disease classification on mri features. In: Graña, M., Toro, C., Posada, J., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems - 16th Annual KES Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 243, pp. 2251–2258. IOS Press (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ayerdi, B., Graña, M.: Hybrid extreme rotation forest. Cognitive Computation (in press, 2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chyzhyk, D., Ayerdi, B., Maiora, J.: Active learning with bootstrapped dendritic classifier applied to medical image segmentation. Pattern Recognition Letters (submitted, 2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Savio, A., García-Sebastián, M., et al.: Neurocognitive disorder detection based on feature vectors extracted from VBM analysis of structural MRI. Computers in Biology and Medicine 41(8), 600–610 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savio, A., Graña, M.: Deformation based feature selection for computer aided diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease. Expert Systems with Applications 40(5), 1619–1628 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, S.M., Jenkinson, M., et al.: Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 23(suppl. 1) S208–S219 (2004) PMID: 15501092Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, Y., Brady, M., et al.: Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 20(1), 45–57 (2001) PMID: 11293691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., Stone, C.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth and Brooks, Monterey (1984)MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Borja Ayerdi
    • 1
  • Alexandre Savio
    • 1
  • Manuel Graña
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo de Inteligencia Computacional (GIC)Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)San SebastianSpain

Personalised recommendations