WAIM 2013: Web-Age Information Management pp 691-697 | Cite as

Collaborative Filtering Using Multidimensional Psychometrics Model

  • Haijun Zhang
  • Xiaoming Zhang
  • Zhoujun Li
  • Chunyang Liu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7923)

Abstract

In this paper, the psychometrics model, i.e. the rating scale model, is extended from one dimension to multiple dimension. Then, based on this, a novel collaborative filtering algorithm is proposed. In this algorithm, user’s interest and item’s quality are represented by vectors. User’s rating for an item is a weighted summation of the user’s latent ratings for the item in all dimensions, in which the weights are user-specific. Moreover, user’s latent rating in each dimension is assumed to follow a multinomial distribution that is determined by the user’s interest value, the item’s quality value in this dimension, and the thresholds between two consecutive ratings. The parameters are estimated by minimizing the loss function using the stochastic gradient descent method. Experimental results on the benchmark data sets show the superiority of our algorithm.

Keywords

Psychometrics Rating Scale Model Collaborative Filtering Latent Interests Stochastic Gradient Descent 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hu, B., Li, Z., Wang, J.: User’s latent interest-based collaborative filtering. In: Gurrin, C., He, Y., Kazai, G., Kruschwitz, U., Little, S., Roelleke, T., Rüger, S., van Rijsbergen, K. (eds.) ECIR 2010. LNCS, vol. 5993, pp. 619–622. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hu, B., Li, Z., Chao, W., et al.: User preference representation based on psychometric models. In: Proc. of 22nd Australasian Database Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Linacre, J.M.: WINSTEPS: Rasch measurement computer program, Chicago (2007), Winsteps.com
  4. 4.
    Rasch, G.: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Institute of Educational Research, Copenhagen (1960)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andrich, D.: A rating formulation for orderedresponse categories. Psychometrikia 43, 561–573 (1978)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koren, Y.: Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In: Proc. of KDD (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, B., Yang, Q., Xue, X.: Can movies and books collaborate?—Cross-domain collaborative filtering for sparsity reduction. In: Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 2052–2057 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, G., Wang, F., Zhang, C.: Collaborative filtering using orthogonal nonnegative matrix tri-factorization. Information Processing & Management 45(3), 368–379 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haijun Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiaoming Zhang
    • 1
  • Zhoujun Li
    • 1
  • Chunyang Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Coordination Center of ChinaNational Computer Network Emergency Response Technical TeamBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations