Visually Capturing Usage Context in BPMN by Small Adaptations of Diagram Notation

  • Guttorm Sindre
  • John Krogstie
  • Sundar Gopalakrishnan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 147)


For mobile and multi-channel information systems it is often relevant to model where something is supposed to take place and what equipment is used. Whereas traditional business process modelling notations seldom capture context, this paper looks at the possibility of extending BPMN diagrams with visual means for capturing location and equipment types used in mobile work processes. A wide range of possible ways for doing this visually is discussed and illustrated, whereupon the most viable alternatives are compared analytically mainly based on principles suggested by Moody. The results indicate that there are several approaches to include such usage context information visually with reasonably good results, but that approaches using intuitive icons to reflect locations and equipment types appear to be the most promising.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fowler, M., Scott, K.: UML Distilled: A brief guide to the standard object modeling language, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jacobson, I., et al.: Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gopalakrishnan, S., Sindre, G.: Alternative Process Notations for Mobile Information Systems. In: Popplewell, K., et al. (eds.) Enterprise Interoperability IV. Making the Internet of the Future for the Future of Enterprise, pp. 13–23. Springer, London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Adapting UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Process Modelling: Experimental Comparison of Two Notation Alternatives. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J., et al. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 145–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Adapted UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Processes: Experimental comparison of colour and pattern fills. In: Halpin, T., Nurcan, S., Krogstie, J., Soffer, P., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2011 and EMMSAD 2011. LNBIP, vol. 81, pp. 314–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gopalakrishnan, S., Sindre, G.: Diagram Notations for Mobile Work Processes. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 52–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Extending Use and Misuse Cases to Capture Mobile Information Systems. In: Fallmyr, T. (ed.) Norsk Konferanse for Organisasjoners Bruk av Informasjonsteknologi (NOKOBIT). Tapir, Trondheim (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Extending Use and Misuse Case Diagrams to Capture Multi-Channel Information Systems. In: Abd Manaf, A., Zeki, A., Zamani, M., Chuprat, S., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds.) ICIEIS 2011, Part I. CCIS, vol. 251, pp. 355–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krogstie, J., Lyytinen, K., Opdahl, A.L., Pernici, B., Siau, K., Smolander, K.: Mobile Information Systems - Research Challenges on the conceptual and logical levels. In: Olivé, À., Yoshikawa, M., Yu, E.S.K. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2784, pp. 124–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kristoffersen, S., Ljungberg, F.: Mobile Use of IT. In: 22nd Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Jyväskylä, Finland (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Esbjörnsson, M.: Work in Motion: Interpretation of Defects along the Roads. In: The 24th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Bergen, Norway (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veijalainen, J.: Developing Mobile Ontologies; who, why, where, and how? In: International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, Manheim (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dourish, P.: Re-space-ing place: “place” and “space” ten years on. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer supported Cooperative Work, pp. 299–308. ACM, Banff (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76. ACM, Boston (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nossum, A., Krogstie, J.: Integrated Quality of Models and Quality of Maps. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2009 and EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 264–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Decker, M., et al.: Modeling Mobile Workflows with BPMN. In: International Conference on Mobile Business/Global Mobility Roundtable (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Decker, M.: Modelling Location-Aware Access Control Constraints for Mobile Workflows with UML Activity Diagrams. In: 3rd International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, Sliema, Malta (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baumeister, H., Koch, N., Kosiuczenko, P., Wirsing, M.: Extending Activity Diagrams to Model Mobile Systems. In: Akşit, M., Mezini, M., Unland, R. (eds.) NODe 2002. LNCS, vol. 2591, pp. 278–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kosiuczenko, P.: Sequence Diagrams for Mobility. In: Olivé, À., Yoshikawa, M., Yu, E.S.K. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2784, pp. 147–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kusek, M., Jezic, G.: Extending UML Sequence Diagrams to Model Agent Mobility. In: Padgham, L., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) AOSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4405, pp. 51–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mendling, J., Recker, J., Reijers, H.A.: On the Usage of Labels and Icons in Business Process Models. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 1(2), 40–58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wand, Y., Weber, R.A.: On the Ontological Expressiveness of Information Systems Analysis and Design Grammars. Journal of Information Systems (1993)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Recker, J., et al.: Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN. In: 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality In Conceptual Modelling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krogstie, J.: Model-based development and Evolution of Information Systems. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J.: Analysis and design of business processes using BPMN. In: Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology-versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling languages: a comparison. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 20, 774–799 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An Analytical Evaluation of BPMN Using a Semiotic Quality Framework. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advanced Topics in Database Research, vol. 5, pp. 94–105. IGI Global (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moody, D.L.: The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35, 756–779 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1983)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 visual notation. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 377–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Silver, B.: BPMN Method & Style, 2nd edn. Cody-Cassidy Press (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guttorm Sindre
    • 1
  • John Krogstie
    • 1
  • Sundar Gopalakrishnan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information ScienceNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations