The Modeling Measure and Time Series Forecasting for Potential Demand in Chinese Residential Market

Conference paper
First Online:

Abstract

Our study establishes the measure model of potential demand in Chinese residential market based on the social and economic origin of exuberant potential demand. We can calculate the potential demand coefficient in Chinese residential market through the model and then substitute the time series data into the double exponential smoothing model to forecast the evolution trend of the potential demand in Chinese residential market.

Keywords

Forecasting Measure Potential demand Residential market 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Benjamin JD, Chinloy P, Jud GD (2004) Real estate versus financial wealth in consumption. J Finan 29:341–354Google Scholar
  2. Chen J, Rutherford RC (2010) Quality and time-on-the-market in residential markets. J Real Estate Finan Econ 44:414–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiuri MC, Jappelli T (2008) Do the elderly reduce housing equity? An international comparison. J Popul Econ 23:643–663Google Scholar
  4. de Vries P, Boelhouwer P (2008) Equilibrium between interest payments and income in the housing market. Hedonic Methods Hous Markets 24:19–29Google Scholar
  5. Gardner DE (1981) Weight factor selection in double exponential smoothing enrollment forecasts. Res High Educ l4:49–56Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton JD (1989) A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57:357–384Google Scholar
  7. Hwanga S, Pedersenb CS (2004) Asymmetric risk measures when modelling emerging markets equities: evidence for regional and timing effects. Emerg Markets Rev 5:109–128Google Scholar
  8. Li LH (1997) Privatization of the urban land market in shanghai. J Real Estate Lit 5:161–168Google Scholar
  9. Murphy E, King EA (2011) Scenario analysis and noise action planning: modelling the impact of mitigation measures on population exposure. Appl Acoust 72:487–494Google Scholar
  10. Pryce G, Gibb K (2006) Submarket dynamics of time to scale. Real Estate Econ 34:377–415Google Scholar
  11. Sirgy MJ, Grzeskowiak S, Su C (2005) Explaining housing preference and choice: the role of self-congruity and functional congruity. J Hous Built Environ 20:329–347Google Scholar
  12. Sivam A (2002) Constraints affecting the efficiency of the urban residential land market in developing countries: a case study of India. Habitat Int 26:523–537Google Scholar
  13. Taylor JW (2003) Exponential smoothing with a damped multiplicative trend. Int J Forecast 19:715–725Google Scholar
  14. Tu Y, Ong SE, Han YH (2008) Turnovers and housing price dynamics: evidence from Singapore condominium market. J Real Estate Finan Econ 38:254–274Google Scholar
  15. Turnbull GK, Zahirovic-Herbert V (2012) The transitory and legacy effects of the rental externality on house price and liquidity. J Real Estate Finan Econ 44:275–297Google Scholar
  16. Yao X (2007) Where are public transit needed: examining potential demand for public transit for commuting trips. Comput Environ Urban Syst 31:535–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and CommerceSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations