A Toolkit for Ring-LWE Cryptography
Recent advances in lattice cryptography, mainly stemming from the development of ring-based primitives such as ring-LWE, have made it possible to design cryptographic schemes whose efficiency is competitive with that of more traditional number-theoretic ones, along with entirely new applications like fully homomorphic encryption. Unfortunately, realizing the full potential of ring-based cryptography has so far been hindered by a lack of practical algorithms and analytical tools for working in this context. As a result, most previous works have focused on very special classes of rings such as power-of-two cyclotomics, which significantly restricts the possible applications.
We bridge this gap by introducing a toolkit of fast, modular algorithms and analytical techniques that can be used in a wide variety of ring-based cryptographic applications, particularly those built around ring-LWE. Our techniques yield applications that work in arbitrary cyclotomic rings, with no loss in their underlying worst-case hardness guarantees, and very little loss in computational efficiency, relative to power-of-two cyclotomics. To demonstrate the toolkit’s applicability, we develop two illustrative applications: a public-key cryptosystem and a “somewhat homomorphic” symmetric encryption scheme. Both apply to arbitrary cyclotomics, have tight parameters, and very efficient implementations.
KeywordsTensor Product Full Version Powerful Basis Ideal Lattice Homomorphic Encryption
- 2.Alwen, J., Peikert, C.: Generating shorter bases for hard random lattices. Theory of Computing Systems 48(3), 535–553 (2011); Preliminary version in STACS 2009Google Scholar
- 8.Brakerski, Z., Gentry, C., Vaikuntanathan, V.: (Leveled) fully homomorphic encryption without bootstrapping. In: ICTS, pp. 309–325 (2012)Google Scholar
- 13.Gentry, C.: A fully homomorphic encryption scheme. PhD thesis, Stanford University (2009), http://crypto.stanford.edu/craig
- 14.Gentry, C.: Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. In: STOC, pp. 169–178 (2009)Google Scholar
- 18.Gentry, C., Halevi, S., Smart, N.P.: Homomorphic evaluation of the AES circuit. In: Safavi-Naini, R. (ed.) CRYPTO 2012. LNCS, vol. 7417, pp. 850–867. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
- 19.Gentry, C., Peikert, C., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions. In: STOC, pp. 197–206 (2008)Google Scholar
- 27.Micciancio, D.: Generalized compact knapsacks, cyclic lattices, and efficient one-way functions. Computational Complexity 16(4), 365–411 (2002); Preliminary version in FOCS 2002 Google Scholar
- 29.Peikert, C.: Public-key cryptosystems from the worst-case shortest vector problem. In: STOC, pp. 333–342 (2009)Google Scholar
- 30.Peikert, C., Rosen, A.: Lattices that admit logarithmic worst-case to average-case connection factors. In: STOC, pp. 478–487 (2007)Google Scholar
- 31.Regev, O.: On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography. J. ACM 56(6), 1–40 (2005); Preliminary version in STOC Google Scholar
- 32.Smart, N.P., Vercauteren, F.: Fully homomorphic SIMD operations. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2011/133 (2011), http://eprint.iacr.org/