Design and Flight Testing of Nonlinear Autoflight Control Laws Incorporating Direct Lift Control

Abstract

This publication describes how direct lift control has been incorporated in a nonlinear autoflight control algorithm. Direct lift control demonstrated its use in earlier aircraft designs. In two recent internal DLR projects, accurate flight path tracking in atmospheric disturbances was an important research goal, where direct lift control could potentially provide an important contribution. In these projects, use has been made of nonlinear control techniques. Objective of this research publication is to incorporate direct lift control in these nonlinear control laws. Simulations as well as flight tests have shown that more accurate flight path changes are achieved by this addition. Direct lift control can be particularly useful for path tracking as well as in turbulent air, since it facilitates lift changes without pitching. The non-minimum phase behaviour of the aircraft caused by the elevators is eliminated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Realattas benchmark definition. Technical Report BRPR-CT98-0627/TP-04v1, REAL Consortium (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauschat, J.-M., Monnich, D., Willemsen, W., Looye, G.: Flight testing robust autoland control laws. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2001-4208 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchholz, J.J., Bauschat, J.-M., Hahn, K.-U., Pausder, H.J.: ATTAS & ATTHeS in-flight simulators. In: AGARD CP -577: Flight Simulation - Where are the Challenges? Braunschweig (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fischenberg, D.: Attas in-air aerodynamikmodell. Institutsbericht IB 111-97/31, German Aerospace Center DLR, Institut fuer Flugmechanik, Braunschweig (September 1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerrits, M.: Direct lift control for the cessna citation ii. Master’s thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelley, W.W.: Simulator evaluation of a flight-path-angle control system for a transport airplane with direct lift control. Technical report NASA-TP-1116, NASA Langley Research Center (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lauterbach, M., Luckner, R.: Vergleich verschiedener regelstrategien für die stufenlose verstellung der hinterkantenklappen im landeanflug. In: Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, pp. 307–318 (2010) (in German)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lombaerts, T.J.J.: Fault Tolerant Flight Control. A Physical Model Approach. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lombaerts, T.J.J., Huisman, H.O., Chu, Q.P., Mulder, J.A., Joosten, D.A.: Nonlinear reconfiguring flight control based on on-line physical model identification. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 32(3), 727–748 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lombaerts, T.J.J., Looye, G.H.N.: Design and flight testing of manual nonlinear flight control laws. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-2011-6469. American Insitutue of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lombaerts, T.J.J., Looye, G.H.N.: Design and flight testing of nonlinear autoflight control laws. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA-2012-4982. American Insitutue of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Looye, G., Joos, H.-D.: Design of autoland controller functions with multiobjective optimization. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 29(2), 475–484 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Looye, G.H.N.: An Integrated Approach to Aircraft Modelling and Flight Control Law Design. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lykken, L.O., Shah, N.M.: Direct lift control for improved automatic landing and performance of transport aircraft. Journal of Aircraft 9(5), 325–332 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McNeill, W.E., Gerdes, R.M., Innis, R.C., Ratcliff, J.D.: A flight study of the use of direct-lift-control flaps to improve station keeping during in-flight refueling. Technical Memorandum TM X-2936, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA94035 (October 1973)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mulder, J.A., van der Vaart, J.C.: Aircraft responses to atmospheric turbulence. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands (May 1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mulder, J.A., van Staveren, W.H.J.J., van der Vaart, J.C., de Weerdt, E.: AE3-302 Flight Dynamics, Lecture Notes. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands (January 25, 2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rouwhorst, W.F.J.A.: Robust and effcient autopilots control laws design, demonstrating the use of modern robust control design methodologies in the autoland system design process - the real project. In: Proceedings of the Aeronautics Days 2001, Hamburg, Germany (January 2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotics and Mechatronics Center, Institute of System Dynamics and ControlGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)WeßlingGermany

Personalised recommendations