Event Structures as a Foundation for Process Model Differencing, Part 1: Acyclic processes

  • Abel Armas-Cervantes
  • Luciano García-Bañuelos
  • Marlon Dumas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7843)

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of comparing process models in terms of their behavior. Given two process models, the problem addressed is that of explaining their differences in terms of simple and intuitive statements. This model differencing operation is needed for example in the context of process consolidation, where analysts need to reconcile differences between process variants in order to produce consolidated process models. The paper presents an approach to acyclic process model differencing based on event structures. First the paper considers the use of prime event structures. It is found that the high level of node duplication inherent to prime event structures hinders on the usefulness of the difference diagnostics that can be extracted thereon. Accordingly, the paper defines a method for producing (asymmetric) event structures with reduced duplication.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Efficient Consistency Measurement Based on Behavioral Profiles of Process Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 37(3), 410–429 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 267–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kunze, M., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Behavioral Similarity - A proper metric. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baldan, P., Corradini, A., Montanari, U.: Contextual Petri Nets, Asymmetric Event Structures, and Processes. Information and Computation 171(1), 1–49 (2001)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Information Systems 36(2), 498–516 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L., Dijkman, R.: Similarity Search of Business Process Models. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 32(3), 23–28 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Glabbeek, R., Goltz, U.: Refinement of actions and equivalence notions for concurrent systems. Acta Informatica 37, 229–327 (2001)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cleaveland, R.: On automatically explaining bisimulation inequivalence. In: Clarke, E., Kurshan, R.P. (eds.) CAV 1990. LNCS, vol. 531, pp. 364–372. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sokolsky, O., Kannan, S., Lee, I.: Simulation-Based Graph Similarity. In: Hermanns, H., Palsberg, J. (eds.) TACAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3920, pp. 426–440. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dijkman, R.: Diagnosing Differences between Business Process Models. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weidlich, M., Polyvyanyy, A., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Causal Behavioural Profiles - Efficient Computation, Applications, and Evaluation. Fundamenta Informaticae 113(3-4), 399–435 (2011)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Dongen, B.F., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijters, T., Maruster, L.: Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(9), 1128–1142 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Badouel, E.: On the α-Reconstructibility of Workflow Nets. In: Haddad, S., Pomello, L. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7347, pp. 128–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weidlich, M., van der Werf, J.M.: On Profiles and Footprints – Relational Semantics for Petri Nets. In: Haddad, S., Pomello, L. (eds.) PETRI NETS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7347, pp. 148–167. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Polyvyany, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Dumas, M.: Structuring acyclic process models. Information Systems 37(6), 518–538 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Polyvyanyy, A., García-Bañuelos, L., Fahland, D., Weske, M.: Maximal Structuring of Acyclic Process Models. The Computer Journal (to appear)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Polyvyanyy, A.: Structuring Process Models. PhD thesis, University of Potsdam, Germany (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Engelfriet, J.: Branching processes of Petri nets. Acta Informatica 28, 575–591 (1991)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nielsen, M., Plotkin, G.D., Winskel, G.: Petri Nets, Event Structures and Domains, Part I. Theoretical Computer Science 13, 85–108 (1981)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Best, E., Devillers, R., Kiehn, A., Pomello, L.: Concurrent bisimulations in Petri nets. Acta Informatica 28, 231–264 (1991)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fahland, D.: From Scenarios to Components. PhD thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.: Simplifying Mined Process Models: An Approach Based on Unfoldings. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 362–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Boudol, G., Castellani, I.: Flow Models of Distributed Computations: Event Structures and Nets. Technical Report 1482, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abel Armas-Cervantes
    • 1
  • Luciano García-Bañuelos
    • 1
  • Marlon Dumas
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of TartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations