Seed Production and Dispersal in the Orobanchaceae

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The seeds of the majority of obligate parasitic Orobanchaceae that develop terminal haustoria are unique in their germination requirements. Unlike the seeds of the facultative parasites, they are usually very small, they are produced in large quantities, and their survival in soil is often very long. Some species develop apomictic seeds from unfertilised ovules. This chapter discusses the dispersal strategies of the obligate holo- and hemiparasites, which determine their reproductive potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baird VM, Riopel JL (1986) The developmental anatomy of Conopholis americana (Orobanchaceae) seedlings and tubercles. Can J Bot 64:710–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekker RM, Kwak MM (2005) Life history traits as predictors of plant rarity, with particular reference to hemiparasitic Orobanchaceae. Folia Geobot 40:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fischer E (2004) Scropulariaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 333–432Google Scholar
  4. Greilhuber J, Weber A (1975) Aneusomaty in Orobanche gracilis. Plant Syst Evol 124:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heckard LR, Chuang TI (1975) Chromosome numbers and polyploidy in Orobanche (Orobanchaceae). Brittonia 27:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jensen HW (1951) The normal and parthenogenetic forms of Orobanche uniflora L. La Cellule 54:135–141Google Scholar
  7. Joel DM, Steffens JC, Matthews DE (1995) Germination of weedy root parasites. In: Kigel J, Galili G (eds) Seed development and germination. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 567–598Google Scholar
  8. Joel DM, Hershenhorn Y, Eizenberg H, Aly R, Ejeta G, Rich PJ, Ransom JK, Sauerborn J, Rubiales D (2007) Biology and management of weedy root parasites. In: Janick J (ed) Horticultural reviews, vol 33. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 267–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Krause D, Weber HC (1990) SEM observations on seeds of Striga spp. and Buchnera americana (Scrophulariaceae). Plant Sys Evol 170:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kroschel J (1998) Striga – how will it affect African agriculture in future? An ecological perspective. Plits (Germany) 16:137–158Google Scholar
  11. Musselman LJ, Dickison WC (1975) The structure and development of the haustorium in parasitic Scrophulariaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 70:183–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pazy B (1998) Diploidization failure and apomixis in Orobanchaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 128:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Plitmann U (2002) Agamospermy is much more common than conceived: a hypothesis. Isr J Plant Sci 50:S111–S117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Price PW (1980) Evolutionary biology of parasites, vol 15, Monographs in evolution biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  15. Rich PJ, Ejeta G (2007) Biology of host-parasite interaction in Striga species. In: Ejeta G, Gressel J (eds) Integrating new technologies for Striga control: towards ending the witch-hunt. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teryokhin ES (1997) Weed broomrapes: systematic, ontogenesis, biology, evolution. Aufstieg, LandshutGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research OrganizationNewe-Ya’ar Research CenterRamat-YishayIsrael

Personalised recommendations