Advertisement

Automating Electric Substations Using IEC 61850

  • Peter J. HawrylakEmail author
  • Jeyasingam Nivethan
  • Mauricio Papa
Chapter
Part of the Energy Systems book series (ENERGY)

Abstract

The Smart Grid will enhance the generation, distribution, transmission, and use of electricity by incorporating elements that will greatly help improve energy efficiency. In addition to traditional components, it will also incorporate small-scale generators, such as home wind turbines and solar panels, into the larger grid. In order to enable energy efficiency as well as other features, two-way communication between utilities and customers (users) will be required. This communication will most likely travel in large part over public networks. The Smart Grid, through the addition of bi-directional communication links throughout the infrastructure, will enable utilities to enhance their service, monitoring, and maintenance activities. Electric power substations will play a major role in the Smart Grid. IEC 61850 is a family of standards that defines network protocols, and data and device naming conventions for electric substation automation. IEC 61850 provides utilities with the ability to better monitor operation and even remotely control the substation when necessary. Part of the utility-substation communication link will be facilitated by public networks (e.g. the Internet). This chapter provides an overview of the IEC 61850 standards and discusses recent experiences with IEC 61850. Challenges facing IEC 61850 deployments, namely security, are presented. Potential solution paths to these challenges are provided.

Keywords

IEC 61850 Smart grid Security Automation  Ethernet 

References

  1. Anderson D, Leischner G (2007) Cybersecurity as part of modern substations. Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. http://www.selinc.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=3530. Accessed 21 Jan 2011
  2. Bergman DC, Jin D, Nicol DM, Yardley T (2009) The virtual power system testbed and inter-testbed integration. In: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on cyber security experimentation and test, USENIX Assoc., Berkeley, CA, USA, 2009Google Scholar
  3. Cortes C, Vapnik K (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis CM, Tate JE, Okhravi H, Grier C, Overbye TJ, Nicol D (2006) SCADA Cyber security testbed development. In: 38th North American Power Symposium, pp 483–488, Carbondale, IL, 17–19 Sept 2006Google Scholar
  5. Deshpande JG, Kim E, Thottan M (2011) Differentiated services QoS in smart grid communication networks. Bell Labs Tech J 16(3):61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dondossola G, Deconinck G, Garrone F, Beitollahi H (2009) Testbeds for assessing critical scenarios in power control systems. In: Setola R, Geretshuber S (eds) Critical information infrastructure security. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5508. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 223–234Google Scholar
  7. Forouzan BA (2003) TCP/IP Protocol suite, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao H, Jin W, Liu G (2008) Simulation study on delay of end-to-end data communication for protective relaying in substations. Front. Electr. Electron. Eng. China 3(2):246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giani A, Karsai G, Roosta T, Shah A, Sinopoli B, Wiley J (2008) A testbed for secure and robust SCADA systems. SIGBED. doi: 10(1145/1399583):1399587
  10. Hahn A, Kregel B, Govindarasu M, Fitzpatrick J, Adnan R, Sridhar S, Higdon M (2010) Development of the PowerCyber SCADA security testbed. In: Sheldon FT, Prowell SJ, Abercrombie RK, Krings A (eds) Proceedings of the sixth annual workshop on cyber security and information intelligence research. ACM, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Higgins N, Vyatkin V, Nair N-KC, Schwarz K (2011) Distributed power system automation with IEC 61850, IEC 61499, and intelligent control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 41(1):81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hossenlopp L (2007) Engineering perspectives on IEC 61850. IEEE Power Energ Mag 5(3):45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IEEE (2008) IEEE 1588–2008—IEEE standard for a precision clock synchronization protocol for networked measurement and control systems, IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. Ingram M, Ehlers R (2007) Toward effective substation automation. IEEE Power Energ Mag 5(3):67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jung S, Song J, Kim S (2008) Design on SCADA test-bed and security device. Int J Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng 3(4):75–86Google Scholar
  16. Kanabar MG, Sidhu TS (2011) Performance of IEC 61850–9-2 process bus and corrective measure for digital relaying. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 26(2):725–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanabar MG, Sidhu TS, Zadeh MRD (2011) Laboratory investigation of IEC 61850–9-2-based Busbar and distance relaying with corrective measure for sampled value loss/delay. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 26(4):2587–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mackiewicz R (2011) Technical overview and benefits of the IEC 61850 standard for substation automation. http://www.sisconet.com/downloads/IEC61850_Overview_and_Benefits_Paper_General.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2011
  19. Men D-Y, Liu W-Y (2011) Application of least squares support vector machine(LS-SVM) based on time series in power system monthly load forecasting. In: 2011 Asia-pacific power and energy engineering conference, Wuhan, China, 25–28 March 2011Google Scholar
  20. Mercurio A, Di Giorgio A, Cioci P (2009) Open-source implementation of monitoring and controlling services for EMS/SCADA systems by means of web services—IEC 61850 and IEC 61970 standards. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 24(3):1148–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moreno N, Flores M, Torres L, Juárez J, González D (2010) Case study: IEC 61850 as automation standard for new substations at CFE, practical experiences. Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. http://www.selinc.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=7405 Accessed 23 Jan 2012
  22. Myrda P, Donahoe K (2007) The true vision of automation. IEEE Power Energ Mag 5(3):32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. North American Electricity Reliability Council (2009) NERC Critical infrastructure protection (CIP) Reliability standards, North American Electricity Reliability CouncilGoogle Scholar
  24. Ozansoy CR, Zayegh A, Kalam A (2009) The application-view model of the international standard IEC 61850. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 24(3):1132–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rietmann P, Reinhardt P (2006) Applying IEC 61850 to substation automation systems. Paper presented at the PSP, (2006) Power System Protection Conference, Bled. Slovenia. 6–8 Sept 2006Google Scholar
  26. Sanchez G, Gomez I, Luque J, Benjumea J, Rivera O (2010) Using internet protocols to implement IEC 60870–5 telecontrol functions. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 25(1):407–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sidhu TS, Yin Y (2007) Modelling and simulation for performance evaluation of IEC61850-based substation communication systems. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 22(3):1482–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stallings W (2000) Data and computer communications, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  29. Stouffer K, Falco J, Scarfone K (2011) Guide to industrial control systems (ICS) security. NIST Special Publication 800–82, Gaithersburg, MDGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang W, Xu Y, Khanna M (2011) A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid. Comput Netw 55:3604–3629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xiong X, Yu J, Liu X, Shen Z (2008) Reliability of substation protection system based on IEC61850. Trans Tianjin University 14(2):118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yu Q, Johnson RJ (2011) Smart grid communications equipment: EMI, safety, and environmental compliance testing considerations. Bell Labs Tech J 16(3):109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Hawrylak
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeyasingam Nivethan
    • 2
  • Mauricio Papa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of TulsaTulsaUSA
  2. 2.Tandy School of Computer ScienceUniversity of TulsaTulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations