Detailed Dominant Approach Cloud Computing Integration with WSN
The maximum benefit out of the recent developments in sensor networking can be achieved via the integration of sensors with Internet. The real-time specific sensor data must be processed and the action must be taken instantaneously. This distributed architecture has numerous similarities with the wireless sensor networks (WSN) where lots of motes, which are responsible for sensing and preprocessing, are connected with wireless connection in the real-time. Since wireless sensor networks are limited in their processing power, battery life, communication speed and storage resources , cloud computing offers the opposite , which makes it fetching for endless observations, analysis and use in different sort of environment.
In this paper we proposed an architecture, which integrates the Cloud computing technology with the wireless sensor network. In this paper we also discussed some research challenges with respect to cloud computing and wireless sensor networks, and important key component of sensor cloud.
KeywordsCloud computing Distributing computing Wireless sensor networks Sensor cloud Research challenges of cloud computing and Internet
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Beng, L.H.: Sensor cloud: towards sensor-enabled cloud services. Intelligent systems center. Nanyang Technological University (April 13, 2009)Google Scholar
- 2.Introduction to Cloud Computing architecture White Paper on sun Microsystems, 1st edn. (June 2009)Google Scholar
- 3.Ulmer, C., Alkalai, L., Yalamanchili, S.: Wireless distributed sensor networks for in-situ exploration of mars. Work in progress for NASA Technical Report, http://users.ece.gatech.edu/
- 4.Chang, F., et al.: Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data. In: OSDI 2006: Seventh Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation, Seattle, WA (2006)Google Scholar
- 5.Lal, N.: A novel survey on Cloud Computing Issues. International Journal of Computer Information Systems (IJCIS) 01(02), 18–21 (2010)Google Scholar
- 6.Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., Zaharia, M.: Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing, UCB/EECS-2009-28. University of California, Berkeley (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Zhao, F., Guibas, L.: Wireless Sensor Networks - An Information Processing Approach. Morgan Kaufmann (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Joseph, J.: Cloud Computing: Computing: Patterns For High Availability, Scalability, and Computing Power With Windows Azure. MSDN Magazine (May 2009)Google Scholar
- 9.Kurschl, W., Mitsch, S., Schönböck, J.: Modeling Distributed Signal Processing Applications. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Body Sensor Networks, Berkeley, USA (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. Computer Networks, 393–422 (March 2002)Google Scholar
- 11.Shi, J., Liu, W.: A Service-oriented Model for Wireless Sensor Networks with Internet. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, CIT 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
- 12.Ullal, J.: Cloud Computing Conference, President and Chief Executive Officer, Arista Networks. Abstract (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Madden, S., Franklin, J., Hellerstein, J.M., Hong, W.: TinyDB: An Acqusitional Query Processing System for Sensor Networks. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 47 (2005)Google Scholar
- 14.Levis, P., et al.: TinyOS: An Operating System for Wireless Sensor Networks. Ambient Intelligence (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Severance, C.: Using Google App Engine. O’Reilly (2009)Google Scholar
- 16.Mell, P., Grance, T.: Draft nist working definition of cloud computing - v15, 21 (August 2005-2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R.E.: Design Patterns. Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Longman (1995)Google Scholar
- 18.Kurschl, W., Mitsch, S., Schonbock, J.: Modeling Distributed Signal Processing Applications. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Body Sensor Networks, Berkeley, USA (2009)Google Scholar