Evolution, Complexity and Artificial Life pp 43-57 | Cite as
Models of Gene Regulation: Integrating Modern Knowledge into the Random Boolean Network Framework
Abstract
Kauffman’s random Boolean networks are abstract, high level models for dynamical behavior of gene regulatory networks. They simulate the time-evolution of genetic regulation within living organisms under strict conditions. The original model, though very attractive by its simplicity, suffered from fundamental shortcomings unveiled by the recent advances in genetics and biology. Using these new discoveries, the model can be improved to reflect current knowledge. Artificial topologies, such as scale-free or hierarchical, are now believed to be closer to that of gene regulatory networks. We have studied actual biological organisms and used parts of their genetic regulatory networks in our models. We also have addressed the improbable full synchronicity of the event taking place on Boolean networks and proposed a more biologically plausible cascading scheme. Finally, we tackled the actual Boolean functions of the model, i.e. the specifics of how genes activate according to the activity of upstream genes, and presented a new update function that takes into account the actual promoting and repressing effects of one gene on another. Improved models demonstrate the expected, biologically sound, behavior of previous GRN model, yet with superior resistance to perturbations. We believe they are one step closer to the biological reality.
Keywords
Boolean Function Degree Distribution Gene Regulatory Network Mouse Embryonic Stem Cell Boolean NetworkNotes
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by NIH grants LM009012, LM010098, AI59694, by the Swiss National Science Foundation grant PBLAP3-136923, and by Neuroscience Program of the Compagnia di San Paolo in Torino. The authors are grateful to Luca Ferreri for his precious help with statistical elaborations and the corresponding figures, and to Joshua L. Payne for his invaluable contribution to the discussions.
References
- 1.Pearson, H.: Genetics: what is a gene? Nature 441(7092), 398–401 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Pennisi, E.: GENOMICS: DNA study forces rethink of what it means to be a gene. Science 316(5831), 1556–1557 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Nowak, MA.: Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (2006)Google Scholar
- 4.Albert, R.: Boolean modeling of genetic regulatory networks. In: Ben-Naim, E., Frauenfelder, H., Toroczkai, Z. (eds.) Complex Networks. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 650, pp. 459–479. Springer, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Bower, J.M., Bolouri, H. (eds.): Computational Modeling of Genetic and Biochemical Networks. MIT, Cambridge, MA (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Edwards, R., Glass, L.: A calculus for relating the dynamics and structure of complex biological networks. In: Berry, R.S., Jortner, J. (eds.) Advances in Chemical Physics, vol. 132, pp. 151–178. Wiley, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Vohradsky, J.: Neural model of the genetic network. J. Biol. Chem. 276(39), 36168–36173 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Blake, W.J., Kaern, M., Cantor, C.R., Collins, J.J.: Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422(6932), 633–637 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Elowitz, M.B., Levine, A.J., Siggia, E.D., Swain, P.S.: Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297(5584), 1183–1186 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Arkin, A., Ross, J., McAdams, H.H.: Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage {lambda}-infected escherichia coli cells. Genetics 149(4), 1633–1648 (1998)Google Scholar
- 11.Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R., Collins, J.J.: Construction of a genetic toggle switch in escherichia coli. Nature 403(6767), 339–342 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Elowitz, M.B., Leibler, S.: A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403(6767), 335–338 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Raser, J.M., O’Shea, E.K.: Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 309(5743), 2010–2013 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Leclerc, R.D.: Survival of the sparsest: robust gene networks are parsimonious. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 214–218 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kauffman, S.A.: Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. J. Theor. Biol. 22, 437–467 (1969)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 16.Aldana, M.: Boolean dynamics of networks with scale-free topology. Phys. D. 185, 45–66 (2003)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 17.Roussel, M.R., Zhu, R.: Validation of an algorithm for delay stochastic simulation of transcription and translation in prokaryotic gene expression. Phys. Biol. 3(4), 274–284 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Drossel, B.: Random boolean networks. Rev. Nonlinear Dynam. Complex. 1, 69–110 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kauffman, S.A.: Investigations. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
- 20.Serra, R., Villani, M., Agostini, L.: On the dynamics of random boolean networks with scale-free outgoing connections. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 339(3–4), 665–673 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 21.Aldana, M., Cluzel, P.: A natural class of robust networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(15), 8710–8714 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Darabos, C., Di Cunto, F., Tomassini, M., Moore, J.H., Provero, P., Giacobini, M.: Additive functions in boolean models of gene regulatory network modules. PLoS One 6(11), e25110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Mesot, B., Teuscher, C.: Critical values in asynchronous random boolean networks. In: Banzhaf, W. (ed.) Advances in Artificial Life, ECAL2003. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2801, pp. 367–376. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
- 24.Gershenson, C.: Updating schemes in random Boolean networks: do they really matter? In: Pollack, J. (ed.) Artificial Life IX Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems, pp. 238–243. MIT, Cambridge, MA (2004)Google Scholar
- 25.Darabos, C., Tomassini, M., Giacobini, M.: Dynamics of unperturbed and noisy generalized boolean networks. J. Theor. Biol. 260(4), 531–544 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 26.Li, F., Long, T., Lu, Y., Ouyang, Q., Tang, C.: The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(14), 4781–4786 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Serra, R., Villani, M., Semeria, A.: Genetic network models and statistical properties of gene expression data in knock-out experiments. J. Theor. Biol. 227, 149–157 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 28.Serra, R., Villani, M., Graudenzi, A., Kauffman, S.A.: Why a simple model of genetic regulatory networks describes the distribution of avalanches in gene expression data. J. Theor. Biol. 246, 449–460 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 29.Aldana, M., Balleza, E., Kauffman, S.A., Resendiz, O.: Robustness and evolvability in genetic regulatory networks. J. Theor. Biol. 245, 433–448 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 30.Kauffman, S.A.: The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)Google Scholar