Non-rigid Self-calibration of a Projective Camera

  • Hanno Ackermann
  • Bodo Rosenhahn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7727)


Rigid structure-from-motion (SfM) usually consists of two steps: First, a projective reconstruction is computed which is then upgraded to Euclidean structure and motion in a subsequent step. Reliable algorithms exist for both problems. In the case of non-rigid SfM, on the other hand, especially the Euclidean upgrading has turned out to be difficult. A few algorithms have been proposed for upgrading an affine reconstruction, and are able to obtain successful 3D-reconstructions. For upgrading a non-rigid projective reconstruction, however, either simple sequences are used, or no 3D-reconstructions are shown at all.

In this article, an algorithm is proposed for estimating the self-calibration of a projectively reconstructed non-rigid scene. In contrast to other algorithms, neither prior knowledge of the non-rigid deformations is required, nor a subsequent step to align different motion bases. An evaluation with synthetic data reveals that the proposed algorithm is robust to noise and it is able to accurately estimate the 3D-reconstructions and the intrinsic calibration. Finally, reconstructions of a challenging real image with strong non-rigid deformation are presented.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hartley, R.I., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2004) ISBN: 0521540518Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bregler, C., Hertzmann, A., Biermann, H.: Recovering non-rigid 3d shape from image streams. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Hilton Head, SC, USA, pp. 690–696 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Triggs, B.: Autocalibration and the absolute quadric. In: Conf. Comp. Vis. and Pat. Recog. (CVPR) (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pollefeys, M., Koch, R., van Gool, L.: Self-calibration and metric reconstruction inspite of varying and unknown intrinsic camera parameters. Int. J. Comp. Vis. (IJCV) 32, 7–25 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seo, Y., Heyden, A.: Auto-calibration by linear iteration using the DAC equation. Img. Vis. Comp. 22, 919–926 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chandraker, M., Agarwal, S., Kahl, F., Nistér, D., Kriegman, D.: Autocalibration via rank-constrained estimation of the absolute quadric. In: Conf. Comp. Vis. and Pat. Recog. (CVPR) (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xiao, J., Chai, J., Kanade, T.: A closed-form solution to non-rigid shape and motion recovery. International Journal of Computer Vision 67, 233–246 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brand, M.: A direct method for 3D factorization of nonrigid motion observed in 2d. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Washington, DC, USA, pp. 122–128 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olsen, S., Bartoli, A.: Implicit non-rigid structure-from-motion with priors. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 31, 233–244 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Torresani, L., Hertzmann, A., Bregler, C.: Nonrigid structure-from-motion: Estimating shape and motion with hierarchical priors. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 30, 878–892 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paladini, M., Del Bue, A., Stosic, M., Dodig, M., Xavier, J., Agapito, L.: Factorization for non-rigid and articulated structure using metric projections. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Miami, FL, USA, pp. 2898–2905 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiao, J., Kanade, T.: Uncalibrated perspective reconstruction of deformable structures. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), vol. 2, pp. 1075–1082 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hartley, R.I., Vidal, R.: Perspective Nonrigid Shape and Motion Recovery. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5302, pp. 276–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brand, M.: Morphable 3D models from video. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 456–463 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heyden, A., Berthilsson, R., Sparr, G.: An iterative factorization method for projective structure and motion from image sequences. International Journal on Computer Vision 17, 981–991 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahamud, S., Hebert, M.: Iterative projective reconstruction from multiple views. In: The Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 430–437 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Akhter, I., Sheikh, Y., Khan, S.: In defense of orthonormality constraints for nonrigid structure from motion. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Miami, FL, USA, pp. 1534–1541 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanno Ackermann
    • 1
  • Bodo Rosenhahn
    • 1
  1. 1.Leibniz University HannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations