Fear-Driven Inference: Mechanisms of Gut Overreaction

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 8)

Abstract

Model-based reasoning requires not only inferences about what is happening, but also evaluations of the desirability of what is happening. Emotions are a key part of such assessments, but sometimes they can lead people astray, as in motivated inference when people believe what fits with their desires. In contrast to motivated inference, fear-driven inference generates beliefs that people do not want to be true. Although paradoxical, this kind of inference is common in many domains, including romantic relationships, health, parenting, politics, and economics. This paper proposes that fear-driven inference results from gut overreactions, in which a feeling that something is wrong is erroneously taken as evidence that something really is wrong. We discuss psychological and neural mechanisms by which gut overreactions can lead to fear-driven inference, and show how a computer model of emotional coherence can explain both fear-driven and motivated inference.

References

  1. 1.
    Gilovich, T.: How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. Free Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D. (eds.): Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (eds.): Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bastardi, A., Uhlmann, E.L., Ross, L.: Wishful thinking: belief, desire, and the motivated evaluation of scientific evidence. Psychol. Sci. 22, 731–732 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kunda, Z.: The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108, 480–498 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kunda, Z.: Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elster, J.: Explaining Social Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mill, J.S.: A System of Logic, 8th edn. Longman, London (1970)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de la Fontaine, J.: Le loup et le renard. http://www.lafontaine.net/lesFables/afficheFable.php?id=214 (2012)
  10. 10.
    Mele, A.R.: Self-Deception Unmasked. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwartz, N., Clore, G.L.: Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychol. Inq. 14, 296–303 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwarz, N.: Feelings as information: informational and motivational functions of affective states. In: Higgins, E.T., Sorrentino, R. (eds.) Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, pp. 527–561. Guilford Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salovey, P., Detweiler-Bedell, B.T., Detweiler-Bedell, J.B., Mayer, J.D.: Emotional intelligence. In: Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J.M., Barrett, L.F. (eds.): Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn, pp. 533–547. Guilford Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E., MacGregor, D.G.: The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D. (eds.) Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgement, pp. 397–420. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Damasio, A.R.: Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schiller, R.: Irrational Exuberance, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Todd, J., Dewhurst, K.: The Othello syndrome: a study in the psychopathology of sexual jealousy. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 122(4), 367–374 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thagard, P.: Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thagard, P.: Why wasn’t O. J. convicted? Emotional coherence in legal inference. Cogn. Emot. 17, 361–383 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scherer, K.R., Schorr, A., Johnstone, T.: Appraisal Processes in Emotion. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prinz, J.: Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thagard, P., Aubie, B.: Emotional consciousness: a neural model of how cognitive appraisal and somatic perception interact to produce qualitative experience. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 811–834 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thagard, P.: The Brain and the Meaning of Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fisher, H.: Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. Henry Holt, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., Rapson, R.L.: Emotional Contagion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iacoboni, M.: Mirroring People: The New Science of How We Connect with Others. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Akerlof, G.A., Shiller, R.J.: Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and why it Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., Welch, N.: Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 127, 267–286 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harris, S., Kaplan, J.T., Curiel, A., Bookheimer, S.Y., Iacoboni, M., Cohen, M.S.: The neural correlates of religious and nonreligious belief. PLoS One 4(10), e7272 (2009). doi: 7210.1371/journal.pone.0007272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris, S., Sheth, S.A., Cohen, M.S.: Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty. Ann. Neurol. 63, 141–147 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hacking, I.: The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thagard, P.: The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations